The striking thing about the passage
Jim quoted earlier this morning, from Jeane Kirkpatrick's
influential 1979 essay "Dictatorships and Double Standards," is
that the factual assertion upon which it's premised -- "most
governments in the world are, as they always have been, autocracies
of one kind or another" -- is no longer true. In 1979 Freedom House
ranked 35% of countries in the world Not Free and only 32% Free. In
Freedom House's latest
report, 45% of countries are ranked Free and only 24% of
countries are ranked Not Free. All of the Free countries are
liberal democracies, and another 14% (a bit shy of half the
countries in the "Partly Free" catagory) are not-so-liberal
electoral democracies, making a total of 59% of countries in the
world at least somewhat democratic.
In short, it's not 1979 anymore, and the "realist" impulse to
pretend that it is betrays an estrangement from reality.
Kirkpatrick's distinction between authoritarian and totalitarian
states remains useful as an analytical tool for spotting which
governments can be pushed toward peaceful reform (the latter --
think North Korea -- cannot be). But pushed to reform they must be,
despite the risk. In the 21st Century, people living under
authoritarian rule are aware that their governments are anomolous,
and will demand democratic representation. The United States needs
to be on the side of those making such demands. If we are not, we
increase the odds that, when dictatorships do fall, the governments
that emerge will adopt an anti-American posture.
Mohammed ElBaradei seems
to be gaining the support of the anti-Mubarak forces, both
secular and Islamist. If he comes out on top in post-Mubarak Egpyt
-- and yes, I am assuming at this point that Mubarak is not going
to survive much longer -- it remains to be seen whether he will
coopt the Muslim Brotherhood or whether they will coopt him. But
even if it's the latter, that doesn't mean an Iran-style theocracy
is around the corner. Again: It's not 1979. The model is more
likely to be the AKP, the democratically elected Islamist party in
Turkey. Claire Berlinski
teases out how this would play out in Egypt (and in Tunisia),
and you should read her whole post. Not pretty, but not the end of
the world either, and if Berlinski is right, not a scenario that
permanently forecloses the triumph of a more palatable
alternative.
Mohammed ElBaradei is an idiot, useless at the UN, and useless
here. This is going to end badly unless we're willing to use force
against the Muslim Brotherhood.
Ken (Old Texican)| 1.31.11 @ 1:03PM
Hey, dumbbunny,
Egypt will starve. Sad but true.
Occam's Tool| 1.31.11 @ 2:55PM
Mohammed ElBaradei is an idiot, useless at the UN, and useless here. This is going to end badly unless we're willing to use force against the Muslim Brotherhood.