The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

President Obama’s State of the Union speech was filled with big government jingoism, attempting to tap into the can-do American spirit to push his expansionist public policy agenda. The media seized on his declaration that this was a “Sputnik moment.” Obama said we should respond to current challenges as we did in the space race and declared that “we do big things.” But it’s worth noting that when America faced its actual Sputnik moment in 1957, the nation was in a much better position to respond precisely because we weren’t as burdened by massive debt from government programs.

Just a few numbers comparing America’s fiscal position in 2011, according to the most recent CBO estimates, to where we stood in 1957, according to historical data:

-- In 2011, the U.S. will run a projected deficit of 9.8 percent of GDP, or nearly $1.5 trillion. In 1957, the government was running a surplus of .8 percent of GDP, or $120 billion if adjusted for the 2011 GDP estimate.

-- In 2011, debt is projected to be 69.4 percent of GDP, and trending upward. In 1957, debt was 48.6 percent of GDP as we were still paying of debt from World War II, but trending downward. Adjusted for today’s dollars, the debt was $3.1 trillion lower back in 1957.

-- In 2011, Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid and other health care programs such as S-Chip cost about $1.6 trillion, or 10.6 percent of GDP. In 1957, Social Security cost 1.5 percent of GDP, or $226 billion if adjusted. Medicare, Medicaid, S-Chip, and related programs did not exist.

The existence of those programs today, however, produces the following outlook from the CBO:

Beyond the 10-year projection period, further increases in federal debt relative to the nation's output almost certainly lie ahead if current policies remain in place. The aging of the population and rising costs for health care will push federal spending as a percentage of GDP well above that in recent decades. Specifically, spending on the government's major mandatory health care programs—Medicare, Medicaid, the Children's Health Insurance Program, and health insurance subsidies to be provided through insurance exchanges—along with Social Security will increase from roughly 10 percent of GDP in 2011 to about 16 percent over the next 25 years. If revenues stay close to their average share of GDP for the past 40 years, that rise in spending will lead to rapidly growing budget deficits and surging federal debt. To prevent debt from becoming unsupportable, policymakers will have to substantially restrain the growth of spending, raise revenues significantly above their historical share of GDP, or pursue some combination of those two approaches.

It’s hard to do “big things” when you have to pay for big government.

View all comments (8) | Leave a comment

bobmontgomery| 1.28.11 @ 3:28PM

Also, when you stopped teaching kids how to read, write and subtract in about 1972, about the same time you started de-emphasizing making things.

jo blo| 1.29.11 @ 2:31AM

Yeah, I noticed that this whole argument was fiscal. BIG problem. This sums up the whole problem: too many 'conservatives' focus on the economic issues and completely ignore the cultural ones.

axbucxdu| 1.29.11 @ 12:49PM

Respectfully disagree. These fiscal problems are direct evidence of the nonsense at the core of leftist/statist philosophy.

Now that more people are sensitive to the sad state of government finances, this connection just needs more forceful and repetitive pronouncements made to the citizens that aren't.

shadow_man| 1.28.11 @ 4:07PM

At least repealing DADT will bring some results. I'm fairly confident we'll see an improvement in the years to come if bigotry doesn't mess it up.

Truth to Power| 1.28.11 @ 4:46PM

Gay men will bring the same improvement they brought to the Catholic Church.

MarkJ| 1.28.11 @ 4:11PM

It's also harder to do big things when you get tied up in legal knots by advocacy groups and even in-fighting bureaucracies within your own government.

Environment impact statements, anyone?

Obama obviously adores The New Deal. Unfortunately he doesn't see any irony in the fact that the administrative and regulatory state it spawned has made large New Deal-style construction projects often difficult, sometimes even impossible, and quite expensive to begin much less complete.

112 men reportedly died while constructing the Hoover Dam. We can only wonder what would have happened if OSHA and the EPA had been around in the 1930's....

Mike| 1.28.11 @ 7:15PM

Yeah, government jingoism as opposed to corporate jingoism.

Tom Osterman| 1.28.11 @ 9:22PM

Corporate jingoism works better.

Leave a Comment

N.B. We encourage readers to share and discuss their thoughtful and relevant comments about this Spectator article. Comments are routinely monitored and will be deleted if profane, bigoted, or grossly impolite. Please be respectful. (And don't feed the trolls!) Thank you.

More Blog Posts by Philip Klein

http://spectator.org/blog/2011/01/28/why-we-cant-do-big-things-1957

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

Special Feature

Better that we become a nation of choosers rather than beggars. Our symposium on choice from the May, 2012 issue:

A Time for Choosing

James Piereson

The Road from Serfdom

Stephen Moore and Peter Ferrara

FLASHBACK TO: 1984

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Meet the Flukes!

F. H. Buckley | 5.25.12

The Wisconsin Turning Point

Peter Ferrara | 5.23.12

In Search of Muhammad

Aymenn Jawad Al-Tamimi | 5.25.12

Age and Kyl

Quin Hillyer | 5.25.12

Follow Me

Jay D. Homnick | 5.25.12

A Test of National Honor

Hal G.P. Colebatch | 5.25.12

How About the Record of DOE Capital?

William Tucker | 5.25.12

The Great Debate

R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr. | 5.24.12

ADVERTISEMENT