Wait a minute, you mean that what the Virginia Attorney General
is looking to confirm or deny (as
are we) actually
happens? With papers touted by the UN’s vaunted,
Nobel-winning IPCC? In very shady circumstances? Wha?
Quick,
rush to protect the University of Virginia from having to
comply with the law! Because, uh, there’s nothing to see
here! Or, ah, laws meant to protect the taxpayers from fraud
should not be applied to a class of people uniquely dependent on
the taxpayer for its money! Or something.
[UPDATE: I retitled this from “IPCC Relied on” because in fact
this report relied on the IPCC’s claims for its own
results — published although the author had been apprised before
its publication that it didn’t survive scrutiny — not the other
way around.]
Richard Baker| 1.20.11 @ 2:11PM
Seems that the folks at UVA are worried that sunshine on their climate activities will be waaaay too revealing. Mr. Jefferson must be rolling in his grave up on the mountain at the shenanigans of his creation. Maybe we need a modern Jefferson to sit up on the peak and observe UVA with Mr. Jefferson's telescope.
George Tobin| 1.20.11 @ 3:48PM
If every professor who appeared to shade or skew government-funded work in an ideologically preferred direction were to be subject to a law enforcement investigations, there will need to be about a 4000% increase in the budget for law enforcement and a massive jail-building project.
I can't get too excited about a clash between the political interests of a showboating attorney general versus the right of tenured academics to continue to crank out politically correct garbage using public funds.
Occam's Tool| 1.20.11 @ 6:26PM
Academic Freedom and Tenure are supposed to be used to protect Professors with controversial views who are representing honest points of view. They are not to be used to protect someone who is engaged in deliberately falsifying his data, as in Wakefield and immunization research (for which he lost his medical license in the UK).
Academic freedom is not a synonym for freedom to commit fraud.
bobmontgomery| 1.20.11 @ 4:06PM
Well, Mr. Non-Excitement, should every intellectually, morally dishonest scumbag of a professor receive the attention he should be receiving from his peers, maybe the person elected to take care of the people's dirty work wouldn't have such a big job to do. And if you are clueless about the the ramifications of this whole episode, which we doubt you are, you are probably an apologist for non-existent 'rights', then you are entitled to remain in your bliss.
BD57| 1.20.11 @ 4:19PM
Oh, I think there's plenty to be perturbed about.
Government-types who think they should get to boss the sheep around pay academics who produce studies, etc. which supposedly prove the sheep should do whatever the government-types want ...
Then the government types wave the "studies" around as evidence of the dire need for the sheep to do what they're told ....
All at the sheep's expense.
bobmontgomery| 1.20.11 @ 5:00PM
And what Mr. 'Nothing to see here' Tobin omits is that this story is a whole lot bigger than just Ken Cucinelli, indeed a whole lot bigger than just UVA or the State of Virginia.
jstwndring| 1.20.11 @ 6:05PM
Proud AGW denier. Damn proud. Yeah. I'm looking at you James Hansen, you arrogant prick. You seem to have something on your face. What is that? Oh, I believe it is egg.