The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

Not Exactly on the Balz

I came across this piece in The Washington Post by Dan Balz contrasting the remarks made yesterday by President Obama and Sarah Palin with respect to the shootings in Tucson.

The article could be summed up in six words: President Obama good, Sarah Palin bad.

But there’s one passage from Balz’s article which demands commentary:

Perhaps by an accident of timing, Palin put herself into the same news cycle as the president. After several days of silence, she offered her first extended commentary on the shootings.

On what planet does Balz reside?

Sarah Palin didn’t put herself into the news cycle. She was thrust into it by Paul Krugman and stood accused of being complicit in mass murder. Those leveling these accusations assured Palin remained in the news cycle by demanding she break her silence. If Palin hadn’t spoken yesterday, liberal pundits would have contrasted Palin’s reticence with Obama’s eloquence.

But alas Palin did speak yesterday and apparently committed an impropriety by having the temerity to speak on the day as President Obama. I didn’t realize Palin was required to seek permission from the liberal media to speak if President Obama plans to speak on the same day.

The bottom line is that Palin is damned if she does and damned if she doesn’t. 

View all comments (21) |

Carol Ann Carelli| 1.13.11 @ 4:24PM

Yes, Sarah Palin is "damned if she does and damned if she doesn't," and I wholeheartedly hope she continues DOING! The ignorant TWITS on Twitter who bash her need to STOP and find a positive cause. They only expose their lack of common sense and good judgement.

MacDaddy| 1.14.11 @ 11:02AM

I thought Sarah knocked it out of the park in a restrained, respectful, dignified fashion. I thought Barrack Obama read an eloquent speech, marred as it was by the campaign-stop environment, and by the perception (shared by many, I suppose) that he meant NOT ONE WORD of what he was reading.

Patriot| 1.13.11 @ 4:29PM

Palin's a lightning rod for the Right; if the Left destroys her, they seriously damage or destroy the credibility of the Tea Party movement.
This ain't rocket-science.

That's why it upsets me so much when people on our side attack her.

NVA Patriot| 1.13.11 @ 7:00PM

Hint: They.are.not.on.our.side

They are simply the 4th priority amongst 100 to deal with. Dem Congress flipped R first-check, senate #2, 2012, President, 2012, New 'establishment' tackled simultaneously with reducing debt, tossing out bureacrats and draining the Swamp that is DC

Patriot| 1.13.11 @ 7:13PM

Okay, then people who are 'pretending to be' on our side attack her.

Tina B| 1.13.11 @ 5:27PM

True and seconded. We are being put into a situation where we must now circle wagons just to hold on to the few rights we still have left. The Fairness Doctrine and proposed anti-gun laws are going to stop the momentum we have gained thus far through the Tea Parties and conservative media outlets. Sarah Palin is one of us. We cannot help them to stifle her. I, too, hate to hear conservatives here criticizing and her using the same garbage the leftists do. Don't you see you are helping the 'bad guys"? We must stand together as they do. Or we will fall together.

I Survived Arlen Specter| 1.13.11 @ 5:39PM

Mr. Goldstein, please explain this to Ross Kaminsky, because he certainly doesn't get it. Thank you for a good, honest perspective on yesterday's events. GOD bless!

NVA PAtriot| 1.13.11 @ 7:03PM

Ross is trolling for hits.

Maybe he's looking for a Washington comPost gig or looking forward to working oppisite Client#9 when CNN dumps what's-her'name

Patriot| 1.13.11 @ 7:14PM

Agreed.

manonthestreet| 1.13.11 @ 6:03PM

They are trying to take Sarah Palin down because they have seen her get over 57 Republicans elected and they are afraid she will win in 2012.
If the Dems lose a lot of seats again they will be out of power for many years.THAT'S WHAT THIS IS ABOUT.PALIN IS DESTROYING THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY AND THE LIBERAL MOVEMENT.

BorderPatriot| 1.13.11 @ 6:43PM

The biggest problem with Palin's response was...she didn't have to respond at all! It's the same old trap.Create a villan with lies and false framework,apply pressure through media,when she responds,it's picked apart and ridiculed even more.With what we know now,four days later,she didn't need to even say anything except maybe condolences;take the moral highground and"Hold the Line"

Patriot| 1.13.11 @ 7:16PM

I thought Sarah did great, I always think Sarah does great. I'm so sorry she has to go through all of this hateful garbage. She's very brave, braver than I.

Richard Baker| 1.13.11 @ 7:25PM

Rush has said that the liberals will always tell you who they fear by who they attack. It appears Sarah Palin is it.

Clint| 1.13.11 @ 8:01PM

Apparently, Dan Balz is missin' his.

hugh BNYN| 1.14.11 @ 12:19AM

DON'T fall for the latest false paradigm controlled
opposition ----Tavistock Institute scripted 'novelty candidate' ----Sarah Palin.

FACT IS capstone Freemasonic 'charitable' foundations and NGO's have been setting the
agenda for decades.

Surely, the Rockefeller, Carnegie, Ford, Gates
Foundations ARE the designers, engineers, funders and founders of globalism and those
diseased China opium syndicate guilt-feuled
notions of world government ---and 'population
control' (sterilization, extermination of the unborn and MASS genocide).

----Freemasonry in its directive upper, capstone
reaches if not only a religion ---it' Luciferian.

DO the homework! ---and get with the DE-program,

Eric Cartman| 1.14.11 @ 2:21AM

That's not what my friend Mork from Ork says.

More Blog Posts by Aaron Goldstein

http://spectator.org/blog/2011/01/13/not-exactly-on-the-balz

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

FLASHBACK TO: 1995

Clip of the Day

ADVERTISEMENT