The Hillreports
that several 2012 GOP primary hopefuls will address House
Republicans at their annual retreat that takes place the weekend,
including Newt Gingrich, Gov. Haley Barbour, and others. The
Hill also mentions that President Obama was not invited.
Last year, he attended the retreat during the Congressional
struggle over the health care bill, and proceeded to
debate several Republicans from his podium. The unusually
candid and confrontational back-and-forth took the Republicans by
surprise, and later on they described it as an “ambush.” As The
Hill relates, “most observers agree[d] the president won
the debate.” In fact it would have been a huge failure if he hadn’t
come off looking better, because he had some significant
advantages: he was all alone on a stage with a podium, while his
interlocutors were below in the crowd, and he got about 75 percent
of the speaking time.
It’s too bad that there won’t be an encore this year. The debate
at the retreat last year was the best discussion of the health care
bill during all the months it was working its way through Congress.
Of course House Republicans would never agree to do another
discussion on those terms, because the image of Obama lecturing
them on policy was damaging. But the playing field could be leveled
out, maybe by allowing congressmen follow-up questions or the last
word on a given topic.
If that were the case, Paul Ryan could pursue him on the budget
and the real cost of the health care bill. Mike Pence could follow
up on the fact that there really hasn’t been a “turnaround…based
on the steps we took,” as Obama then claimed of the stimulus. On
the other hand, Obama could pressure the Republicans on specific
spending cuts or a fully-developed alternative to Obamacare —
which would give Republicans a compelling incentive to refine their
message on those topics.
Overall it would allow the Republicans to hold Obama accountable
and Obama to expose some of the Republicans’ hedging on key issues.
At the very least it would be more interesting than Gingrich
talking to fellow Republicans.
I'm old fashioned on this one. You never give publicity and a
forum to your political opponent, particularly a president. You'll
lose everytime, notwithstanding having the better arguments and
people who really know the issues
No, I diagree--good NOT TO INVITE OBAMA. WHY ? BECAUSE AS THE
PRESIDENT he can take advantage of the office and manipulate
Republicans yet again. Its not that OBAMA has a better argument. he
has the higher office and the "respect" that that office commands.
There in my view lies the problem.
The debacle of this president’s administration is both a cause
and a symptom of the decline of American values. Unless Congress
impeaches him, that decline will go on unchecked. An eminent jurist
surveys the damage and assesses the chances for the recovery of our
culture.
The American Christmas, like the songs that celebrate it,
makes room for everybody under the rainbow. Is that why so
many people seem to be hostile to it?
Floyd Looney| 1.11.11 @ 7:43PM
That reminds me of the Parlamentary "Question Time" from the UK. That might be a good idea once a week or month.
PCC| 1.12.11 @ 8:34AM
Of course they should invite the President. Give him an opportunity to attend or decline. What's the down side? He has the better argument?
around the track| 1.12.11 @ 8:49AM
I'm old fashioned on this one. You never give publicity and a forum to your political opponent, particularly a president. You'll lose everytime, notwithstanding having the better arguments and people who really know the issues
martin j smith| 1.12.11 @ 8:58AM
No, I diagree--good NOT TO INVITE OBAMA. WHY ? BECAUSE AS THE PRESIDENT he can take advantage of the office and manipulate Republicans yet again. Its not that OBAMA has a better argument. he has the higher office and the "respect" that that office commands. There in my view lies the problem.