Supporters of the DREAM Act will undoubtedly try to revive it in
some form — if the Obama administration doesn’t just use
humanitarian parole to impose it by administrative fiat. But it
really is a big setback for amnesty supporters that they couldn’t
ram this bill — with many sympathetic beneficiaries and
difficult-to-explan technical flaws — through the lame-duck
session. The next Congress will be even less amenable to these
kinds of proposals. It really shows how little desire there is for
amnesty among a majority of Americans.
Oldefarte| 12.18.10 @ 1:41PM
%%%%HAPPY DAYS ARE HERE AGAIN, THEY SKY IS BLUE.......%%%%%
Hyacinth| 12.18.10 @ 2:50PM
It is time to seal the borders, cut off the handouts and freebies to illegals, enforce e-verify and eliminate voter fraud in this country. Are you listening 112th congress?
You have been elected and sent to Washington for a reason (multiple reasons actually.) So let's see a clear indications that "You Get It"!
kingsmill| 12.18.10 @ 6:19PM
The six sell out RINOs that voted for repeal of DADT will vote for the Dream Act in a reincarnated version. They need better cover, but they will be yes votes.
Philip| 12.18.10 @ 8:50PM
Don't DREAM It's Over : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HVUO0I8N7B0
Lyrics :
Hey now, hey now
Don't dream it's over
Hey now, hey now
When the world comes in
They come, they come
To build a wall between us
We know they won't win
Far Right Double Standards| 12.19.10 @ 4:47PM
Of course there's no way the President can impose this by "fiat." But something tells me if the GOP wins back the White House and lacks a filibuster proof Senate majority, the author and his ilk wouldn't have too much of a problem with President Romney using "fiat" to "ram through" a conservative agenda. Although I somehow doubt the terminology would be the same in that case. Merely a hunch.