The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

Whither the Afghan War?

The administration has issued a cautiously positive assessment of the war in Afghanistan.  It sees gains, though they are fragile:

While the momentum achieved by the Taliban in recent years has been arrested in much of the country and reversed in some key areas, these gains remain fragile and reversible. Consolidating those gains will require that we make more progress with Pakistan to eliminate sanctuaries for violent extremist networks. Durability also requires continued work with Afghanistan to transfer cleared areas to their security forces.

Of course, the biggest problem is that the Afghan government is not an effective partner and is widely distrusted, and often hated, by Afghans, at least those who are not on its payroll.  After nine years of nation-building, we haven’t built much of a nation.  Thus, it is hard to create anything permanent to solidify the American military’s successes.

Indeed, while the Taliban has been losing ground in Kandahar, it has been expanding in the north.  And the Red Cross reports that security is growing worse, threatening its humanitarian mission.  Reports the New York Times:

The International Committee of the Red Cross, which usually seeks to avoid the public eye, held a rare news conference here on Wednesday to express deep concern that Afghanistan security had deteriorated to its worst point since the overthrow of the Taliban nine years ago and was preventing aid groups from reaching victims of conflict.

All this after nine years of war.

Afghanistan is a great tragedy, but there’s no good security argument for staying trying to make it better.  Al-Qaeda has largely moved to Pakistan:  terrorists can operate most anywhere.  Who rules Kabul isn’t likely to affect al-Qaeda’s operations much.  There’s an obvious humanitarian interest in creating a liberal, pro-Western central government in Afghanistan.  But after nine years all the U.S. has managed to do is install a corrupt regime for which few Afghans want to die.  Americans shouldn’t be dying for it either.

View all comments (4) |

ncatty| 12.16.10 @ 10:35AM

No need to make a big deal out of it, just leave.

Robster| 12.16.10 @ 1:33PM

Time we stop trying to hold the entire world together and concentrate on how to keep America together here at home. We have gotten no more secure by maintaining a presence or conducting operations against the Taliban in Afghanistan, and that is not a slight against our troops. They have performed above and beyond as is most often the case. As long as Pakistan is unable to control cross-border infiltration whereby the key Taliban targets of our search and destroy missions go unabated, they will remain at alrge. Yes we have hurt their ability to plan and conduct attacks against US interests, but face it, the terrorists are everywhere! And what is with the aceptance of Iranian cash by Karzai? I mean come on, how plain and simple does it have to be? Corruption supported is corruption multiplied! Get out now and save more American soldiers lives. Let Pakistan defend itself and her neighbors.

Red Phillips | 12.16.10 @ 2:00PM

Good post. Can't wait to see what "sky is falling" imagined scenarios the War on Terror uber hawks come up with to illustrate why we just can't leave Afghanistan.

Derek Leaberry| 12.16.10 @ 2:55PM

President Obama could send Secretary Gates and General Mullen to Afghanistan in hopes that that dynamic duo won't be able to betray the military once again.

More Blog Posts by Doug Bandow

http://spectator.org/blog/2010/12/16/whither-the-afghan-war

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

FLASHBACK TO: 1995

Clip of the Day

ADVERTISEMENT