No sooner did Wisconsin GOP chairman
Reince Priebus emerge as a leading rival to Michael Steele for
chairmanship of the Republican National Committee than Priebus
got hit by the revelation that his Milwaukee law firm helped
its clients get federal stimulus funds.
Interestingly, the revelation seemed to hit Priebus almost
simultaneously from two different ideological directions — the
stimulus story being reported Tuesday by both
Tim Mak at the “centrist” Web site Frum Forum and by
conservative
Dan Riehl at Andrew Brietbart’s BigGovernment.com.
My own
immediate reaction was that this looks bad enough to sink
Priebus’s challenge. Priebus told Mak “he has never worked with his
firm’s ‘Stimulus and Economic Recovery’ group,” but Riehl says it
looks like Priebus is trying to hide online evidence of his
involvement. Whatever the case, even indirect involvement with
Obama’s stimulus program — anathema to conservatives — could
be heavily damaging.
The double hits raise the question of who is gunning for
Priebus. Obviously, Steele’s supporters would have a motive to
release “oppo” research to damage a rival, but so would supporters
of Steele’s other rivals, who include Saul Anuzis of Michigan (who
was one of Steele’s rivals for the chairmanship two years ago),
former RNC political director Gentry Collins and Ann Wagner of
Missouri, who has been
called a “conservative star” by St. Louis-based blogger Jim
Hoft.
Of the 168 members who will have a vote next month when the
RNC meets in Washington, more than 120 have still not
committed to support any candidate for the chairmanship. Critics of
Steele have blamed the chairman for the committee’s lackluster
fundraising during the 2010 election cycle.
WL| 12.16.10 @ 1:13AM
Hmmm....I am having a hard time caring. After November 2, I told myself and my family that it would be the last (of many) Republican votes I would cast until they showed me that they REALLY ARE something other than the GOOD COP fighting the unwinnable war against the BAD COP (The dems, that is)...
So far...I honestly give them a 3 on a scale of 10...
Not zero...and DEFINITELY NOT 10...
NOW...of course they haven't been seated yet...so we'll see...............
BUT...I'll let you guess whether my money is on "BEING IMPRESSED" or "BEING DISSAPOINTED...AGAIN" by the GOP come 2012...............................................................................
Susan Grant| 12.16.10 @ 12:07PM
WL sounds a little like he has too much time on his hands OR he has a drinking problem. If ole WL thinks the Repubs are the lesser of two evils, he has been spending entirely too much time on the Huffington Post.By the way, who gives a crock what WL thinks, as he can't think clearly period.
WL| 12.16.10 @ 1:17AM
FOLKS...I just want to point out one thing to you "REPUBS are the lesser of two Evils, so you have to vote for them" FOLKS (of whom I have usually agreed with, BEFORE I started being honest with myself).....
DO YOU NOTICE HOW THERE IS S-T-I-L-L J-U-S-T E-N-O-U-G-H votes to pass the crappy bills.....
Roger Spires| 1.14.11 @ 7:18AM
No, we don't have to vote for a lesser of two evils. this is the thinking that allows theses "let's give in and call it a compromise" RINOS to stay in Congress. Nothing will change in the party until the party is one ideologically. Sometimes you need a RIF to get stronger.
beebop| 12.16.10 @ 6:06AM
WL? Willie Loman?
Not buying your tortured logic -- which if followed to its illogical conclusion would mean don't bother to vote.
Rogue Elephant| 12.16.10 @ 7:42AM
Why does it matter who outed Priebus? The conservative base would view him as tainted. (Thanks, hitman!)
Thinking outside the box, maybe the RNC Chair should go to a tainted RINO. This positions the GOP as part of the problem (which it is) and keep the energy in the Tea Party (where it belongs).
Dohnal | 12.16.10 @ 12:18PM
It is the job of a law firm to do for their clients what helps them. They are not supposed to put their personal political views in the way of helping a client.
Priebus was not involved in any of this, he was busy taking good care of the state GOP. I would hate to lose him but he would be a great chair of the GOP.
Bob Dohnal, Publisher
The Conservative Digest
JJ522| 12.16.10 @ 12:29PM
I'm with Bob Dohnal - where's the problem? I also opposed the Obama stimulus, but I didn't quit my state job when my agency got a chunk or
the money, or turn down the overtime it paid for.
I'm not that pure, and I doubt many of you are, either.
If the thing has passed and the money is going to spent *anyway* I don't see anything wrong with a law firm helping its clients get some of it or a governor, senator or congressman trying to make sure some of it is spent in his state.
Later,
Joe
Willy| 12.16.10 @ 12:57PM
I really don't care who replaces Steele...as long as he is replaced. Any more Haley Barbours out there?
SteveT | 12.16.10 @ 2:11PM
I am sorry to see this attack on Reince. I have worked with him in the past and he is a very sharp guy. He has done very well for the WI GOP and would do well as RNC Chair.
In context, this looks like a very minor issue. It would be sad if this torpedoes his bid.
JB1| 12.16.10 @ 4:49PM
GOP elite blame Steele for fund raising issues. I blame the GOP establishment. That is why I sent my money to specific candidates, to keep it out of their hands. They can vote Steele out but it wont improve the fund raising.
eekinsman | 12.17.10 @ 11:54PM
Reince is not a front runner for nothing. His unparalleled success in Wisconsin, which was no small feat, what with the cheese-liberal cabal. He can and will lead the national party to a clean sweep.