March 1, 2013 | 4 comments
February 12, 2013 | 0 comments
August 14, 2012 | 18 comments
August 12, 2012 | 16 comments
August 11, 2012 | 13 comments
A friend passes along on an odd message sent to constituents and supporters of Sen.-elect Mark Kirk (R-Ill.). Kirk talks about the impending expiration of the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts, and essentially makes the case for why some kind of deal extending them is necessary: “After a long debate, the President and Congressional leaders proposed bipartisan legislation to ensure the U.S. economy does not suffer a $4 trillion tax-hike shock and risk starting another recession.”
The Kirk missive then takes a less decisive turn: “Tell Me What You Think. Should Congress enact the bipartisan tax bill proposed by President Obama and Senate leaders?” The options are yes, no, and I don’t know. The incoming senator concludes: “I will tell you where I stand when I hear from you.”
It’s probably no more than an exercise in making constituents feel like he cares about their opinions, with the possible benefit of beefing up their mailing lists. But it doesn’t read like Profiles in Courage.
A man of faith in a godless age is hitting Americans where it hurts.
Mr. and Mrs. American Spectator Reader, let P.J. O’Rourke talk sense to your kids.
In Britain, defending your property can get you life.
The debacle of this president’s administration is both a cause and a symptom of the decline of American values. Unless Congress impeaches him, that decline will go on unchecked. An eminent jurist surveys the damage and assesses the chances for the recovery of our culture.
It won’t take long for conservatives to scratch this presidential wannabe off their 2008 scorecard.
The American Christmas, like the songs that celebrate it, makes room for everybody under the rainbow. Is that why so many people seem to be hostile to it?
Was the President done in by the economy, or by the politics of the economy?