April 2, 2012 | 12 comments
March 31, 2012 | 8 comments
February 22, 2012 | 7 comments
January 12, 2012 | 8 comments
December 15, 2011 | 3 comments
In a side-story accompanying WaPo’s Cancun coverage today the resident geniuses appear to call greenhouse gases (the two leading of which are water vapor, followed by carbon dioxide), toxic.
The [Kyoto] accord doesn’t make developing nations responsible for reducing emissions because they haven’t produced much, but they are encouraged to preserve natural resources and invest in alternative energy to lower future emissions.
It all looked great on paper, but not so much in the real world. The biggest polluters, the United States and China - which account for about a quarter of the world’s people and nearly half of its toxic emissions - are not bound by the agreement.
Note: they’re not beyond editing up their mistakes, as ‘haven’t produced’ in the very close vicinity of ‘toxic’ was originally ‘haven’t produce’ in my print edition. This comes on the heels of President Obama twice saying in speeches, to no comment by WaPo, that carbon dioxide ‘poison[s] the water we drink’.
Right, guys. But, yes, I know, I know. ‘The science is settled.’
A man of faith in a godless age is hitting Americans where it hurts.
Mr. and Mrs. American Spectator Reader, let P.J. O’Rourke talk sense to your kids.
In Britain, defending your property can get you life.
It won’t take long for conservatives to scratch this presidential wannabe off their 2008 scorecard.
Was the President done in by the economy, or by the politics of the economy?