“In Mexico, Socialist International outlines priorities for
COP16” reads the
release. One could say the Obama administration has weighed in
early, what with this being the
former home of the woman in charge of U.S. policy on such
matters, ‘Energy and Environment Czar’ Carol Browner.
Whether that is the case, or if the cadre is simply doing fine
without former SI Commissioner Browner, after she transitioned into
the Obama administration, here is the core of
their demand:
First and foremost amongst the priorities highlighted was the
urgent need for an ambitious and realistic international agreement
with binding commitments, objectives and deadlines, and as a
minimum, the formalisation of the voluntary pledges made since
Copenhagen. It was noted that even if every pledge made since
Copenhagen were formalised and honoured, it would still leave the
world far short of what was needed. The necessity for deeper
emission cuts was emphasised, keeping in mind the principle of
common but differentiated responsibilities thus ensuring that the
wealthiest nations reduce their emissions first and the
most….
The need to put into place the proposal to create the Copenhagen
Green Fund to mobilise 100 billion dollars per year by 2020 to
assist developing countries was emphasised, along with the
importance to set a multilateral framework to fulfil the short-term
commitment of 10 billion dollars per year in 2010, 2011 and
2012.
So, that’s what the world’s socialists demand to ‘combat climate
change’. Imagine their demands to combat continental drift.
Stan Redmond| 11.30.10 @ 9:36AM
When conmen like Gore figure out how to make trillions of dollars from catastraphic continental drift we'll hear a lot more about it.
Stupid people sign petitions to end women's suffrage and ban dihydrogen monoxide, they'll fall for the next scam.
David Carr| 11.30.10 @ 9:54AM
What's wrong with ending women's suffrage? It seems to me that most of the anti-liberty legislation passed in this country has occurred since 1920. However, I am in favor of dihydrogen monoxide.
Neanderthal| 11.30.10 @ 10:09AM
David, don't you realize that dihydrogen monoxide kills? People drown when exposed to too much of the stuff. Perhaps an EPA rulemaking is called for?
Faffnir| 11.30.10 @ 11:49AM
Actually, I'm more in favour of some scotch with my dihydrogen monoxide. About eight-to-one, thanks. Or, my favourite chemical experiment: six parts gin to one part vermouth.
Pete| 11.30.10 @ 10:38AM
"the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities " Chew on that one for a while. What a pack of kooks.
klem| 11.30.10 @ 11:07AM
Um...I'm chewing...still chewing...ok I give up smarty pants. What does it mean?