Great news. Greenwire reports:
“Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee Chairman Jeff
Bingaman (D-N.M.) is hoping to pass a package of public lands and
wilderness bills during the lame-duck session of Congress.
Bingaman’s panel has sent more than 60 bills to the floor this
session that would create new national parks, monuments, wilderness
areas and wildlife sanctuaries. Now he’s hoping to bundle them into
an omnibus measure for Senate passage before the 111th Congress
adjourns, spokesman Bill Wicker confirmed today.”
Can’t get cap-n-trade? Doesn’t matter.
Just a symptom. Not the disease. The ongoing *direct* land
grab (mostly, but not exclusively) out West continues apace while
other regulations seal off the land less directly by
effectively taking its most productive use. As I opened Chapter 8,
“Domestic Disturbance”, in
Power Grab:
“Immediately upon taking office, President Obama rushed to seal
off our domestic energy supplies from public access. In a frenzied
offensive, he intensified the long-running, multi-front campaign by
his allies seeking to block production and use of the abundant coal
lying beneath the ground. Obama vowed new policies to “bankrupt”
coal and cause energy prices to “necessarily skyrocket.” America’s
ability to supply oil and gas was already dangerously threatened by
inane measures severely limiting domestic production.
A few of these - executive and legislative moratoria on much
offshore exploration and production, and the same regarding our
enormous “oil shale” deposits on land - had only recently been
lifted after long-overdue public outcry. Soon these were placed in
limbo again by Obama delaying a plan to manage the
resources….Obama’s political pandering to radicals pursuing a
retrograde obsession with privation causes productivity, real
wages, and employment to drop, which ultimately drags the economy
down with them. …
With the anti-growth, anti-energy radicals now installed in the
two political branches of government, on top of increasingly
activist courts, Washington is aggressively doubling down on a
long-simmering war against our prosperity, freedoms, and safety.
…As individual Americans suffer now, and with our national
security already imperiled by these policies as detailed in Chapter
9, “Insecurity Complex,” much more of the same is being cynically
pushed in the name of enhancing our security and returning
us to prosperity. The only thing enhanced here at home is state
control of power, in all senses of the term.”
We have known
for some time that the anti-energy crowd had their eyes on
much, much more land lock-up. This agenda, while largely being
executed under far too much authority already existing in (or being
claimed by) the executive branch, it also benefits from an assist
from Capitol Hill, and that seems to be what Sen. Bingaman is
trying to expedite before the House is lost. This is a
War on the West (the focus of an important joint hearing)
is, viewed more broadly, a war on American energy and a war on
freedom.
danny| 11.12.10 @ 2:35PM
How long will it take for the United States to become de-forested when we all have to depend on burning wood for our energy needs if these fools are not stopped? Better wake up America.
Occam's Tool| 11.12.10 @ 5:22PM
To be a Democrat in New Mexico is to be a swine. I lived there for a year; I know. Glad I left; beautiful land, disgusting society.
Booger| 11.12.10 @ 8:48PM
How does that make New Mexico's Democrats any different than all the others?
Explosion Proof Light | 11.13.10 @ 12:34AM
For most Americans, Obama doesn't seem to be giving them something they don't have, but instead to be taking away something they already value.
MikeD| 11.13.10 @ 12:45AM
What if the member list of every obstructionist environmental wacko group were fed into a data base, and then EVERY member would be rounded up and branded on the forehead with indellible ink: ENVIROFREAK!.
Then, anybody with the mark would be legally prohibited from using ANY energy. That would mean: no travel in a motorized vehicle; no heating or cooling in their homes; no access to any building/home built using wood; no clothing with any synthetic fibers (They are made from petrochemicals); no food that was transported in motorized vehicles; no food that required fertilized or motorized equipment in its' life cycle; and no medical treatments or medications produced or distributed by motorized vehicles. That about does it, unless you can think of any additional examples.
Then we'll see how they feel after a year or so.
cats1cowboy| 11.13.10 @ 8:01AM
Mike, They would also be required to hold their breath and stop spewing 2 cubic feet of carbon emissions into the atmosphere, every day.
clairesolt| 11.13.10 @ 11:11AM
Draft them all and put them to work planting ground cover and trees in the Middle East. If they are not fit to work, relocate them to wilderness areas.
We saw during the month th oil spread in the gulf that they are incapable of providing solutions. They ae just obstructionists.
PattyMor| 11.13.10 @ 4:38PM
What we have is a government that is in direct and total warefare against its own society and people. They are the same group of people that parade around on jets and hop into SUV's to tell YOU not to use any energy.
Control freaks, marxists, communists, or socialists; the label is all the same.
alanstorm| 11.15.10 @ 4:52PM
If today's environmentalists actually believed what they preach, we'd never hear from them. They'd be living among the Amish - assuming the Amish could tolerate them.
Jen| 11.16.10 @ 12:50PM
PattyMor --- and muslims. You forgot them. We're getting reeeaaallll close to getting sick of muslims since the TSA BS,