So Socialist Prime Minister of Spain Jose Luis Rodriguez
Zapatero is proposing
at the G20 meeting that nations agree to create green jobs as their
way out of the current economic crisis. He says he will create a
million jobs in the green sector, and we should follow him. This
happens to be the same thing he said as Spain’s unemployment
doubled to 20% amid a binge of debt-financed, job-killing mandates
for ‘green ’ electricity. Now Spain is the ‘world leader’.
Help!
Among Zapatero’s converts was one President
Barack Obama. Obama no longer mentions Spain as his model, for
very good reason.
Is Zapatero just remarkably stubborn or
slow at learning? Not really.
He knows things are even worse than originally exposed. He’s
counting on others playing the role of Dunce. He is even counting
on others playing that role — the Obama administration — despite
also knowing the truth.
If I had to assign a word to describe Zapatero’s gambit, it
wouldn’t be the tempting ‘Hail-Mary’, but instead
‘Solyndra’.
Solyndra is a Spanish solar panel company
bailed out by the US taxpayer with no strings attached, which
hundreds of millions borrowed by the Obama administration from
China and in your name were proved almost immediately to have been
squandered, as the company flounders.
More please!
Of course, such companies are the most likely recipients of
enormous infusions of taxpayer-debt. Viable firms get their money
from the capital markets. These firms, however, turn to
politicians, proving far too much with the argument that, unless
they get such an infusion, it’s curtains. Somehow, they end up
getting the infusion. Markets work. Politicians, well, not so much,
at least when it comes to picking winners. Picking losers? They’re
your guys.
Solyndra is just one of many Spanish companies that ran this
game on the Obama administration which appears to at least have
blindly looked the other way from these interests’ unique lack of
viability. An American University investigative assessment titled
“Blown
Away” opened:
Overseas firms collecting most green energy
money
Thursday, October 29th, 2009
One of the major selling points of President Barack Obama’s $787
billion stimulus plan was that it would put the economy back on
track partly by investing in renewable energy industries, like wind
and solar.
The president and many other advocates of alternative energy
argue that an investment in green energy would lessen the nation’s
reliance on foreign oil, cut greenhouse gases, and most
importantly, create thousands of new jobs for out-of-work
Americans.
But of the $1.05 billion in clean-energy grants handed out by
the government since Sept. 1, 84 percent - a total of $849 million
- has gone to foreign wind companies. Spanish utility company,
Iberdrola S.A., alone has collected $545 million through its
American subsidiary.
Even more striking is the fact that there are few restrictions
on the how the grants can be used, according to a transcript of a
Treasury Department briefing. In fact, more than $800 million has
been given to firms for wind farms that were already producing
electricity before they received the grants, according to a review
of the records by the Investigative Reporting Workshop at American
University.
So Zapatero’s push looks a little less inane and more cunning.
He doesn’t think much of us. But he’ll take our money to keep his
teetering economy from becoming the next Greece. As the
Economist wrote in 2009:
Big in America? Spanish firms hope to
benefit from America’s stimulus plan
Apr 8th 2009 | MADRID A
MERICAN companies are not the only ones hoping for a boost from
Barack Obama’s economic stimulus plan. Spanish firms are also
positioning themselves to benefit from what they call el Plan
Obama. Other foreign companies are jostling for some of the $317
billion of intended spending, but Spain is the only country to have
built a campaign around it.
You see, Zapatero created (with the too-able assistance of his
Popular Party predecessors/accomplices) a bubble of a phony
industry, killing real and prospective jobs and sustained only by
continued infusion of taxpayer debt and increased energy prices
(further killing jobs), which bubble burst when that debt was
admitted to be unsustainable.
As Madrid economics professor Dr. Gabriel Calzada exposed, the
‘green jobs’ industry in Spain saw their only hope in Uncle Sucker
coming to the rescue and keeping the bubble filled with transferred
billions. That is why he was decried as ‘unpatriotic’ by the
renewables industry and communist-affiliated trade union. They
complained he wasn’t supposed to let that cat out of the bag.
Zapatero has on his hands a bunch of rent-seeking welfare queens
who exist and prosper not for reasons of performance or
economic advantage, but solely because of politicians directing
billions their way. Solyndra and other Spanish companies already
received billions in a lifeline from the indebted US taxpayer,
which also must be continued or these interests go bust, as
has already begun to prove true.
So Zapatero is merely the ambulance-chasing plaintiff’s lawyer,
the huckster who argues the facially absurd and who many will blame
when the jury awards his client millions for spilling scalding
coffee over his crotch. We are the jury. If we fall for this.
Amor de Cosmos| 11.12.10 @ 9:51AM
While generally I agree that certain "green" industries are rent seekers more adept at obtaining loan guarantees, grants or special tax credits (solar and ethanol being the worst), that does not hold for all of these technologies. The plan was to enact cap and trade to drive up costs for energy so that they would be able to be comprtitive with fossil fuels. Thankfully, the American people on November 2 killed that plan.
However, not all "green" energy is a boondoggle industry. Much can be done and is done with adoption of new technology to conserve energy. Moreover, much can be done and is done to use waste streams for something more than filling up landfills. Don't tar the entire sector when there are pockets of it that rely on a sound business case not any kind of government assistance.
Eric Cartman| 11.12.10 @ 11:07AM
No one is tarring the whole industry. (By the way, I love tar. We should make more of it - a lot more. Tar baby, tar!). We don't like the "rent seekers more adept at obtaining loan guarantees, grants or special tax credits" that is the industry business model today. When a viable energy (nukes anyone?) or new technology (Bloom Energy) comes along and proves its worth in the market by proven results or attracting venture capital, let's all sing Kum Ba Ya. Cost is the measure of worth and so far, gasoline from anything but oil is a bust.
Explosion Proof Light | 11.13.10 @ 12:37AM
Anything that reduces the deficit is okay
owyheewine| 11.12.10 @ 11:22AM
Aside from the fact that none of the green technologies make sense thermodynamically, how many folks stop and think about the economics of the fantasy of green jobs. If all of those new technologies create those massive amounts of "good, well paying jobs", how will that massive cost be reflected in the cost of the energy produced? Just wondering.
CalMark| 11.12.10 @ 1:11PM
The Spanish PM is a typical socialist: arrogant, mendacious, and dishonest far beyond the point of corruption.
He says that HE will "create" jobs. Since when has a socialist politician created anything useful, let alone jobs?
Larry| 11.12.10 @ 1:47PM
Solar and wind are still incredibly innefficient, and forecast to provide less than 3% of energy.
Wind farms and solar panels require about 2 acres of land per KW produced, hardly an efficient use of land or esthetics.
News.Raafatrola | 11.13.10 @ 12:19PM
is it really possible for spanish PM to create jobs out of Green, I personally doubt it as at the moment, jobless countries need more exports and yet another economic reform. Yeah , if Go Green is another economic reform, then sure.
Jim S| 11.13.10 @ 1:38PM
What "green" energy isn't a boondoggle? None are economically able to compete with coal, gas, oil, nuclear. All green energy needs subsidies. That sounds like a pretty good definition of boondoggle.