Newt Gingrich
continues to float the possibility of running in 2012. The Fort
Worth Star Telegram reports that in a book appearance:
He said he'll decide in February or March whether to make a bid
for the office. It's an enticing thought, he said.
"The clear, vivid choice between where Obama would take us and I
think where most Americans want to go makes it very appealing to
see if we could actually run a very issue- and education-oriented
campaign," he said.
In the run-up to 2008, Gingrich exploited speculation about a
possible presidential bid to promote his brand, books, and American
Solutions conference before deciding not to launch a campaign.
Until he actually announces he's running, I'll continue to assume
that's the case this time around.
Would that be the same Newt that sat next to Nancy Pelosi and
said we need to do something about man made global warming?
Sean| 11.12.10 @ 1:40PM
Maybe he could lecture us on the dangers of global warming. Newt
needs to just go away.
Lesser Weevil| 11.12.10 @ 1:43PM
No Newts is good Newts.
danny| 11.12.10 @ 2:24PM
Lesser Weevil, Ain't that the truth!
bahmi| 11.12.10 @ 2:38PM
Newt must go...he's very similar to John McKain. Erratic, often
brilliant, but ultimately a disappointing character.
J.C.Eaton| 11.12.10 @ 2:49PM
If testosterone was gasoline, Newtie wouldn't have enough to
drive around the inside of a Cheerio.
Nobama2010| 11.12.10 @ 2:56PM
As a conservative, I would not vote for him. Any guy who
divorces his wife while she has cancer is a scumbag
Derek Leaberry| 11.12.10 @ 3:04PM
When the Republican candidates "debate" at these candidate
forums, it will be amusing to see Speaker Blabbermouth keep replies
to two or three minutes, if he indeed runs. Mr. Gingrich likes to
talk and to listen to himself talk and then talk some more.
Gingrich's three marriages and his serial adulteries will limit
his appeal and he'll probably not run. Lack of personal virtue
works pretty well with the Democrats but the Republicans are a
little more stern- only one divorce is allowed and no obvious
adultery. Count Senators Vitter and Ensign out as well. The King of
Blab, Rush Limbaugh, too.
serfer62| 11.12.10 @ 4:07PM
I think the country has had enough of maligent egos...the lizard
has changed his skin too often.
Oldefarte| 11.12.10 @ 4:16PM
Whether he runs or not is immaterial at this point. There are
numerous available Republican candidates that [any/all] would be
preferable to the Muslim Harvard law degreed MORON that is on a
path toward the complete destruction of this country. Some of us
would vote for Howdy-Doody over the current occupant of the White
House!!!!
For most Americans, Obama doesn't seem to be giving them
something they don't have, but instead to be taking away something
they already value.
Oldefarte| 11.13.10 @ 11:33AM
Obama is destroying this country from his socialistic domestic
welfare proposals, his insane foreign policy methods, his criminal
attacks upon states/regions for political purposes,etc. There is
nothing good [and never will be] about he and his administrations
activities, and this country is forced to bear the brunt of his
actions sadly!!!!!!!!
JimH| 11.15.10 @ 11:57AM
Historically it is too early to say, but in the long run the
election of Obama may have helped the conservative/libertarian
cause far more than a McCain victory would have. His policies and
appointments have clearly concentrated people’s minds as the
dangers of Progressive statism. Think of it as an innoculation
against even more statism.
Lucis mommy| 12.28.10 @ 9:10PM
What your saying resembles George W. NOY Obama. You
conservatives are nothing more than copycats. You obviously don't
follow politics or you would know your comments are incorrect..lol.
Open your crummy ears to real conversation instead of lies. Have a
nice day
paultex| 11.12.10 @ 4:38PM
Newt hasn't run for election/re-election since the late 1990s.
He's definitely out of the habit of campaigning for office. In
fact, he may have forgotten how to run for office.
Beating Obama in 2012 will require a solid Republican candidate
who is accustomed to fighting hard for votes while fighting off
attacks from the left-wingers. That doesn't sound like the
present-day Newt. You time on the scene is over, Newt. The game has
changed without you in it.
donserge| 11.12.10 @ 4:49PM
Read or listen carefully to any Gingrich speech and you will
find an "all inclusive Republican Party" between the lines.....read
Snowe, Collins, Graham, Murkowski, etc.
Sam| 11.12.10 @ 5:05PM
I would like to see Mitch Daniels or John Thune win the GOP
nomination. If it's Sarah Palin or Newt Gingrich, I will be voting
for Obama.
bobbymike| 11.12.10 @ 8:19PM
Sam - good plan vote for an avowed socialist bent on destroying
the country over Palin or Gingrich.
Lucismommy| 12.28.10 @ 9:15PM
Your obviously speaking about Georg W. You repubs hate it so bad
that you lost that you cannot even see a half desent president when
it hits u in the face. Grow up and go with the flow. Bush hurried
our asses and your still on his side. I really don't get you
people. Do you like what he did ti our country. Geesh......
CalMark| 11.12.10 @ 8:51PM
There was a lot of excitement about Newt running in '08. At the
very last minute, he backed out--and there was a huge letdown.
Newt missed his big chance. And once you've done that, you
shouldn't come back and try again. It only leads to disaster for
yourself--and your Party.
Anyway, anybody who says they'd vote for Obama over Palin or
even Gingrich is not even a Republican, let alone a
conservative.
Taxpayer| 11.13.10 @ 12:22AM
Yes, exactly. Newt had his chance--in 1994. And blew it.
danny| 11.12.10 @ 9:17PM
For some reason every time I think of Newt, DeDe Scozsafava or
whatever the hell her name is comes to mind.
Oldefarte| 11.13.10 @ 11:36AM
Correspondingly, for every time you think of Obama, do you also
think of Pilosi, Reid, Jones, Berwick, Emmanuel,
Garrett,etc????????????
Syd Chaden| 11.13.10 @ 12:02PM
Politically, Gingrich is probably the most intelligent,
best-informed, most experienced potential candidate of the bunch.
However, at the moment, our major need is not for political
know-how in the White House. We need someone who has demonstrated
the leadership, management and economic know-how and skills
required to best run the country. Lawyers need not apply.
Sean| 11.13.10 @ 2:41PM
Stop with the Gingrich being the "most intelligent,
best-informed, most experienced potential candidate" bull. He is
not and never will be. He fell for the global warming scam. How
intelligent and well informed do you think that is?
All Hail The Stupid Party!| 11.13.10 @ 4:09PM
If Newt Gingrich runs in 2012 he will be smoked. Gingrich is not
in it to serve Americans, he is in it to accrue more power for
himself. Gingrich is the GOP status quo & has no problem
crossing the aisle to pass bad legislation with the left. Gingrich
is also involved with the CFR who definitely do not have America's
best interests in mind. Gingrich surrendered any chance of becoming
POTUS when he fell for AGW & became chummy with The Shrieker Of
The House & when he endorsed Dede Scozzafava over the
conservative in New York's 23rd Congressional district last year
& lambasted conservatives for disagreeing forcefully with his
endorsement. Newt Gingrich is just another John McCain & like
McCain he will always come before the American people. No thanks
Newt. Go away please.
Lucis mommy| 12.28.10 @ 9:42PM
You know..I would not vote for newt but the right n left r
supposed to work together so I could not blame either party if they
would just work together on important things. I wish there were no
more dividing lines. This is causing so much hatred among the
voters.
PattyMor| 11.13.10 @ 4:44PM
Newt has some great ideas but he is best left to the think tank,
We someone who can take on Obama and the establishment
Republicans.
Anyone who has done a commercial on global warming with Nancy
Pelosi is OUT. PERIOD.
It would be a disaster from the family values angle. Third
marriage, two divorces, gay sister. What a fine speech he might
give defending family values from the onslaught of us gay people
asking permission to marry just once under any name. And if he's a
hypocrite and sinner on the foundations of society, on what else
could he be too?
Occam's Tool| 11.14.10 @ 1:12AM
I think Thune, Jindal, or Pence have the Gravitas to make a run.
Don't rule out Marco Rubio, incidentally. Another fine potential
candidate. But Pawlenty is not inspiring, and Palin, unfortunately,
is a highly polarizing figure.
But any of them is better than Obama. I don't think Newt's going
to run.
Margie| 11.14.10 @ 8:05PM
I agree with your suggested guys, all excellent. And how about
Allen West? He can run on the platform of Restoring American
Exceptionalism, like his website says. And he's very pro-Israel. He
gets it. He'd be the perfect antitheses to Obama.
http://allenwestforcongress.com/issues
pete2| 11.14.10 @ 11:22AM
About time conservatives got over the Newt Gingricht, Rush
Limbaugh, lovefest and starting looking at real conservatives like
Sarah Palin. That woman has done more damage to the left than Newt
or Rush's mouth. So all you ditto heads should smarten up some.
SpiralArchitect| 11.14.10 @ 1:08PM
Surely sounds like you know a little about Palin & almost
nothing about Rush.
Palin, at best would have to do a long venture over a couple
years to 'let' people find out just exactly she did do in
Alaska.
Perhaps if she could shake her ( incomplete and wrongfully
labeled) 'quitter' label she could make a realistic run at
POTUS.
Until then there would just be a divided vote versus Democrats;
obviously not a good way to wing a vote, be it pop or thru the
electoral cabbage :)
Rush & Newt both are Generals, leaders and planners. Not
good as POTUS material, vote dividers each - a gimme for the
opposition.
Cris Worth| 11.14.10 @ 6:27PM
Gingrich proved his mettle as a planner and nuts & bolts
kind a guy. Thank you for the 1994 election cycle the Contract for
America was a stroke of genius; it nationalized the election and
gave voters a clear alternative unlike this election cycle where
the GOP has no distinguishable alternative plan. But it ends there
Gingrich is too old, his personal life questionable and he flunked
as Speaker.
JimmyT| 11.14.10 @ 10:28PM
The only thing Gingrich is running is his mouth. He is as far
out of sync with what has happened in America, via the TP, as all
the other establishment apparatchiks. He must be planning a new
book in 2012.
ACynic| 11.15.10 @ 10:38AM
If Newt runs, the dems will win. He has skill in explaining and
presenting ideas and mostly conservative views, but he is a
divisive figure and he is easy to dislike. He should remain an
advisor to conservatives.
ncatty| 11.12.10 @ 1:38PM
A good assumption.
Mac | 11.12.10 @ 1:40PM
Would that be the same Newt that sat next to Nancy Pelosi and said we need to do something about man made global warming?
Sean| 11.12.10 @ 1:40PM
Maybe he could lecture us on the dangers of global warming. Newt needs to just go away.
Lesser Weevil| 11.12.10 @ 1:43PM
No Newts is good Newts.
danny| 11.12.10 @ 2:24PM
Lesser Weevil, Ain't that the truth!
bahmi| 11.12.10 @ 2:38PM
Newt must go...he's very similar to John McKain. Erratic, often brilliant, but ultimately a disappointing character.
J.C.Eaton| 11.12.10 @ 2:49PM
If testosterone was gasoline, Newtie wouldn't have enough to drive around the inside of a Cheerio.
Nobama2010| 11.12.10 @ 2:56PM
As a conservative, I would not vote for him. Any guy who divorces his wife while she has cancer is a scumbag
Derek Leaberry| 11.12.10 @ 3:04PM
When the Republican candidates "debate" at these candidate forums, it will be amusing to see Speaker Blabbermouth keep replies to two or three minutes, if he indeed runs. Mr. Gingrich likes to talk and to listen to himself talk and then talk some more.
Gingrich's three marriages and his serial adulteries will limit his appeal and he'll probably not run. Lack of personal virtue works pretty well with the Democrats but the Republicans are a little more stern- only one divorce is allowed and no obvious adultery. Count Senators Vitter and Ensign out as well. The King of Blab, Rush Limbaugh, too.
serfer62| 11.12.10 @ 4:07PM
I think the country has had enough of maligent egos...the lizard has changed his skin too often.
Oldefarte| 11.12.10 @ 4:16PM
Whether he runs or not is immaterial at this point. There are numerous available Republican candidates that [any/all] would be preferable to the Muslim Harvard law degreed MORON that is on a path toward the complete destruction of this country. Some of us would vote for Howdy-Doody over the current occupant of the White House!!!!
Explosion Proof Light| 11.13.10 @ 12:35AM
For most Americans, Obama doesn't seem to be giving them something they don't have, but instead to be taking away something they already value.
Oldefarte| 11.13.10 @ 11:33AM
Obama is destroying this country from his socialistic domestic welfare proposals, his insane foreign policy methods, his criminal attacks upon states/regions for political purposes,etc. There is nothing good [and never will be] about he and his administrations activities, and this country is forced to bear the brunt of his actions sadly!!!!!!!!
JimH| 11.15.10 @ 11:57AM
Historically it is too early to say, but in the long run the election of Obama may have helped the conservative/libertarian cause far more than a McCain victory would have. His policies and appointments have clearly concentrated people’s minds as the dangers of Progressive statism. Think of it as an innoculation against even more statism.
Lucis mommy| 12.28.10 @ 9:10PM
What your saying resembles George W. NOY Obama. You conservatives are nothing more than copycats. You obviously don't follow politics or you would know your comments are incorrect..lol. Open your crummy ears to real conversation instead of lies. Have a nice day
paultex| 11.12.10 @ 4:38PM
Newt hasn't run for election/re-election since the late 1990s. He's definitely out of the habit of campaigning for office. In fact, he may have forgotten how to run for office.
Beating Obama in 2012 will require a solid Republican candidate who is accustomed to fighting hard for votes while fighting off attacks from the left-wingers. That doesn't sound like the present-day Newt. You time on the scene is over, Newt. The game has changed without you in it.
donserge| 11.12.10 @ 4:49PM
Read or listen carefully to any Gingrich speech and you will find an "all inclusive Republican Party" between the lines.....read Snowe, Collins, Graham, Murkowski, etc.
Sam| 11.12.10 @ 5:05PM
I would like to see Mitch Daniels or John Thune win the GOP nomination. If it's Sarah Palin or Newt Gingrich, I will be voting for Obama.
bobbymike| 11.12.10 @ 8:19PM
Sam - good plan vote for an avowed socialist bent on destroying the country over Palin or Gingrich.
Lucismommy| 12.28.10 @ 9:15PM
Your obviously speaking about Georg W. You repubs hate it so bad that you lost that you cannot even see a half desent president when it hits u in the face. Grow up and go with the flow. Bush hurried our asses and your still on his side. I really don't get you people. Do you like what he did ti our country. Geesh......
CalMark| 11.12.10 @ 8:51PM
There was a lot of excitement about Newt running in '08. At the very last minute, he backed out--and there was a huge letdown.
Newt missed his big chance. And once you've done that, you shouldn't come back and try again. It only leads to disaster for yourself--and your Party.
Anyway, anybody who says they'd vote for Obama over Palin or even Gingrich is not even a Republican, let alone a conservative.
Taxpayer| 11.13.10 @ 12:22AM
Yes, exactly. Newt had his chance--in 1994. And blew it.
danny| 11.12.10 @ 9:17PM
For some reason every time I think of Newt, DeDe Scozsafava or whatever the hell her name is comes to mind.
Oldefarte| 11.13.10 @ 11:36AM
Correspondingly, for every time you think of Obama, do you also think of Pilosi, Reid, Jones, Berwick, Emmanuel, Garrett,etc????????????
Syd Chaden| 11.13.10 @ 12:02PM
Politically, Gingrich is probably the most intelligent, best-informed, most experienced potential candidate of the bunch. However, at the moment, our major need is not for political know-how in the White House. We need someone who has demonstrated the leadership, management and economic know-how and skills required to best run the country. Lawyers need not apply.
Sean| 11.13.10 @ 2:41PM
Stop with the Gingrich being the "most intelligent, best-informed, most experienced potential candidate" bull. He is not and never will be. He fell for the global warming scam. How intelligent and well informed do you think that is?
All Hail The Stupid Party!| 11.13.10 @ 4:09PM
If Newt Gingrich runs in 2012 he will be smoked. Gingrich is not in it to serve Americans, he is in it to accrue more power for himself. Gingrich is the GOP status quo & has no problem crossing the aisle to pass bad legislation with the left. Gingrich is also involved with the CFR who definitely do not have America's best interests in mind. Gingrich surrendered any chance of becoming POTUS when he fell for AGW & became chummy with The Shrieker Of The House & when he endorsed Dede Scozzafava over the conservative in New York's 23rd Congressional district last year & lambasted conservatives for disagreeing forcefully with his endorsement. Newt Gingrich is just another John McCain & like McCain he will always come before the American people. No thanks Newt. Go away please.
Lucis mommy| 12.28.10 @ 9:42PM
You know..I would not vote for newt but the right n left r supposed to work together so I could not blame either party if they would just work together on important things. I wish there were no more dividing lines. This is causing so much hatred among the voters.
PattyMor| 11.13.10 @ 4:44PM
Newt has some great ideas but he is best left to the think tank, We someone who can take on Obama and the establishment Republicans.
Anyone who has done a commercial on global warming with Nancy Pelosi is OUT. PERIOD.
Jim Hlavac| 11.13.10 @ 5:01PM
It would be a disaster from the family values angle. Third marriage, two divorces, gay sister. What a fine speech he might give defending family values from the onslaught of us gay people asking permission to marry just once under any name. And if he's a hypocrite and sinner on the foundations of society, on what else could he be too?
Occam's Tool| 11.14.10 @ 1:12AM
I think Thune, Jindal, or Pence have the Gravitas to make a run. Don't rule out Marco Rubio, incidentally. Another fine potential candidate. But Pawlenty is not inspiring, and Palin, unfortunately, is a highly polarizing figure.
But any of them is better than Obama. I don't think Newt's going to run.
Margie| 11.14.10 @ 8:05PM
I agree with your suggested guys, all excellent. And how about Allen West? He can run on the platform of Restoring American Exceptionalism, like his website says. And he's very pro-Israel. He gets it. He'd be the perfect antitheses to Obama.
http://allenwestforcongress.com/issues
pete2| 11.14.10 @ 11:22AM
About time conservatives got over the Newt Gingricht, Rush Limbaugh, lovefest and starting looking at real conservatives like Sarah Palin. That woman has done more damage to the left than Newt or Rush's mouth. So all you ditto heads should smarten up some.
SpiralArchitect| 11.14.10 @ 1:08PM
Surely sounds like you know a little about Palin & almost nothing about Rush.
Palin, at best would have to do a long venture over a couple years to 'let' people find out just exactly she did do in Alaska.
Perhaps if she could shake her ( incomplete and wrongfully labeled) 'quitter' label she could make a realistic run at POTUS.
Until then there would just be a divided vote versus Democrats; obviously not a good way to wing a vote, be it pop or thru the electoral cabbage :)
Rush & Newt both are Generals, leaders and planners. Not good as POTUS material, vote dividers each - a gimme for the opposition.
Cris Worth| 11.14.10 @ 6:27PM
Gingrich proved his mettle as a planner and nuts & bolts kind a guy. Thank you for the 1994 election cycle the Contract for America was a stroke of genius; it nationalized the election and gave voters a clear alternative unlike this election cycle where the GOP has no distinguishable alternative plan. But it ends there Gingrich is too old, his personal life questionable and he flunked as Speaker.
JimmyT| 11.14.10 @ 10:28PM
The only thing Gingrich is running is his mouth. He is as far out of sync with what has happened in America, via the TP, as all the other establishment apparatchiks. He must be planning a new book in 2012.
ACynic| 11.15.10 @ 10:38AM
If Newt runs, the dems will win. He has skill in explaining and presenting ideas and mostly conservative views, but he is a divisive figure and he is easy to dislike. He should remain an advisor to conservatives.