April 2, 2012 | 12 comments
March 31, 2012 | 8 comments
February 22, 2012 | 7 comments
January 12, 2012 | 8 comments
December 15, 2011 | 3 comments
No cap-n-trade, ensuring (one would hope) no Kyoto II? No problem!
Actually, there’s more to this story and, if pursued instead of Kyoto II, and not in the interim until they can find a way to also ration energy use (carbon dioxide emissions), then I can think of worse occupations for certain never-idle hands. Heck, Obama could have slipped ratification of the Law of the Sea Treaty through as a honeymoon/first 100 days item (expressly governing ‘land-borne pollution’ and has a court!) and fortunately he blew the chance. So keep them busy fiddling with Montreal to reduce HFCs.
And here’s a hint about some of the nerdish intrigue involved: watch how Europe takes to this approach ad ask yourself why are they so upset?
A man of faith in a godless age is hitting Americans where it hurts.
Mr. and Mrs. American Spectator Reader, let P.J. O’Rourke talk sense to your kids.
In Britain, defending your property can get you life.
It won’t take long for conservatives to scratch this presidential wannabe off their 2008 scorecard.
Was the President done in by the economy, or by the politics of the economy?