The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

Michael Graham is right to say, “The worst place to be a Republican in America today is Massachusetts.” As a Bay State native and someone who thought Massachusetts Republicans might be poised to make gains, I agree the results aren’t terribly impressive. But he’s wrong to suggest that things weren’t any different from normal.

Yesterday Barney Frank won with 54 percent of the vote — a point behind Nikki Tsongas, who was running in a more competitive district — to Republican Sean Bielat’s 43 percent. In 2008, Frank beat his Republican challenger 68 percent to 25 percent. In 2006, he was unopposed. In 2004, he won 78 percent of the vote. This is a district Barack Obama carried with 63 percent, John Kerry and Al Gore with 65 percent.

Democrat William Keating won William Delahunt’s House seat with 47 percent of the vote to Republican Jeff Perry’s 42 percent. Delahunt was unopposed in 2008, won 64 percent in 2006, and took 66 percent in 2004. No Republican has done as well as Perry in this district since Delahunt’s first congressional race in 1996. And Keating’s margin of victory was less than half Delahunt’s. In all, Republicans broke 40 percent in half the congressional races.

In 2006, Deval Patrick was elected governor by a 20-point margin over Republican Kerry Healey, 55 percent to 35 percent. Yesterday he was reelected over Republican Charlie Baker by 49 percent to 42 percent, with another center-right candidate taking 8 percent. Here’s where being a normal election year might have helped: the state Republican Party would have put all its resources into the governor’s race and Tim Cahill probably wouldn’t have run as an independent.

Graham is correct when he concludes, “If the unions and state workers and Democratic operatives want to win an election here - any election - they win.” That’s why most Republican victories, from Bill Weld to Scott Brown, occurred when the Democrats were taken by surprise. But it is going to take a lot of building to change that. If Republicans quit after one election cycle, despite progress, then Brown’s election will indeed be a fluke.

View all comments (5) |

PatttyMor| 11.3.10 @ 1:27PM

What is the point of electing Republicans in Taxachusetts when the Reps. enact legislation such as Romney Care??

Ryan| 11.3.10 @ 1:36PM

What occurred there was that "triage" that the Dems had to perform. The more money spent there, the less they had for other races.

Kingsmill| 11.3.10 @ 1:46PM

The MA Republican party apparatus is dominated by self interested consultants who run campaigns as if they were flown in from another planet.

There is no organic Republican party machinery. Successful campaigns are run by and for individual personalities who come on the scene and are able to exploit unique situations a la Scott Brown and Bill Weld. Until an authentic party is able to take root Massachusetts will continue heading towards it's California like fate.

Rogue Elephant | 11.3.10 @ 1:50PM

Massachusetts, like California, needs to be "quarantined" - made to internalize the full cost of its own folly.

Just as the US subsidy of European defense fed the growth of the European social welfare state, so federal subsidy/bailouts of these states insures them against their folly.

Federalism means that the states are free to be "laboratories of experimentation". But it also means that states must pay for their own mistakes (and be "mugged by reality").

More Blog Posts by W. James Antle, III

http://spectator.org/blog/2010/11/03/about-that-massachusetts-meltd

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

FLASHBACK TO: 1995

Clip of the Day

ADVERTISEMENT