Michael Graham is right to
say, “The worst place to be a Republican in America today is
Massachusetts.” As a Bay State native and someone who thought
Massachusetts Republicans might be poised to make gains, I agree
the results aren’t terribly impressive. But he’s wrong to suggest
that things weren’t any different from normal.
Yesterday Barney Frank won with 54 percent of the vote — a
point behind Nikki Tsongas, who was running in a more competitive
district — to Republican Sean Bielat’s 43 percent. In 2008, Frank
beat his Republican challenger 68 percent to 25 percent. In 2006,
he was unopposed. In 2004, he won 78 percent of the vote. This is a
district Barack Obama carried with 63 percent, John Kerry and Al
Gore with 65 percent.
Democrat William Keating won William Delahunt’s House seat with
47 percent of the vote to Republican Jeff Perry’s 42 percent.
Delahunt was unopposed in 2008, won 64 percent in 2006, and took 66
percent in 2004. No Republican has done as well as Perry in this
district since Delahunt’s first congressional race in 1996. And
Keating’s margin of victory was less than half Delahunt’s. In all,
Republicans broke 40 percent in half the congressional races.
In 2006, Deval Patrick was elected governor by a 20-point margin
over Republican Kerry Healey, 55 percent to 35 percent. Yesterday
he was reelected over Republican Charlie Baker by 49 percent to 42
percent, with another center-right candidate taking 8 percent.
Here’s where being a normal election year might have helped: the
state Republican Party would have put all its resources into the
governor’s race and Tim Cahill probably wouldn’t have run as an
independent.
Graham is correct when he concludes, “If the unions and state
workers and Democratic operatives want to win an election here -
any election - they win.” That’s why most Republican victories,
from Bill Weld to Scott Brown, occurred when the Democrats were
taken by surprise. But it is going to take a lot of building to
change that. If Republicans quit after one election cycle, despite
progress, then Brown’s election will indeed be a fluke.
PatttyMor| 11.3.10 @ 1:27PM
What is the point of electing Republicans in Taxachusetts when the Reps. enact legislation such as Romney Care??
Ryan| 11.3.10 @ 1:36PM
What occurred there was that "triage" that the Dems had to perform. The more money spent there, the less they had for other races.
Kingsmill| 11.3.10 @ 1:46PM
The MA Republican party apparatus is dominated by self interested consultants who run campaigns as if they were flown in from another planet.
There is no organic Republican party machinery. Successful campaigns are run by and for individual personalities who come on the scene and are able to exploit unique situations a la Scott Brown and Bill Weld. Until an authentic party is able to take root Massachusetts will continue heading towards it's California like fate.
Rogue Elephant | 11.3.10 @ 1:50PM
Massachusetts, like California, needs to be "quarantined" - made to internalize the full cost of its own folly.
Just as the US subsidy of European defense fed the growth of the European social welfare state, so federal subsidy/bailouts of these states insures them against their folly.
Federalism means that the states are free to be "laboratories of experimentation". But it also means that states must pay for their own mistakes (and be "mugged by reality").