March 1, 2013 | 4 comments
February 12, 2013 | 0 comments
August 14, 2012 | 18 comments
August 12, 2012 | 16 comments
August 11, 2012 | 13 comments
On Friday, I wrote about Randy Moss’ return to New England in a Minnesota Vikings uniform. Like so much else in the NFL, this event was overshadowed by all things Brett Favre. Though Moss was limited to one reception for eight yards — he did draw a couple of helpful penalties, and would have surely caught a touchdown were it not for pass interference — he didn’t cede the spotlight willingly. Moss gave one of his classic press conferences, in which he announced he would be sticking to self-interviews for the remainder of the season, followed by words of praise for his old team and little nice to say about his new (though once old) one.
Who knows why Moss says and does these things? But his remarks did convey some sense, however foggy, that being a millionaire further padding his millions may not be as fun as playing a game he loves with his friends. Especially since his role in the Minnesota offense doesn’t look much different. So far, he has just gone from clearing things out over the middle for Wes Welker to clearing things out over the middle for Percy Harvin.
UPDATE: And the Vikings have waived Randy Moss.
A man of faith in a godless age is hitting Americans where it hurts.
Mr. and Mrs. American Spectator Reader, let P.J. O’Rourke talk sense to your kids.
In Britain, defending your property can get you life.
The debacle of this president’s administration is both a cause and a symptom of the decline of American values. Unless Congress impeaches him, that decline will go on unchecked. An eminent jurist surveys the damage and assesses the chances for the recovery of our culture.
It won’t take long for conservatives to scratch this presidential wannabe off their 2008 scorecard.
The American Christmas, like the songs that celebrate it, makes room for everybody under the rainbow. Is that why so many people seem to be hostile to it?
Was the President done in by the economy, or by the politics of the economy?
H/T to National Review Online