The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

The New Republic's Jonathan Cohn has a counterfactual article out based on a premise that there's an alternate universe in which President Obama abandoned his health care push and Democrats were facing historic defeat anyway.

From an ideological liberal perspective, there's plenty of ways you could argue that given the ephemeral nature of political power and the importance of moving toward a society with universal health insurance, Democrats were right to pass something when they had the chance, whatever the political costs. .

Yet from a political perspective, it's hard to argue that the health care law has been anything but a disaster for Democrats. While we'll have a better sense of things once we can look at actual results to see if those Democrats who voted "no" on ObamaCare fared better than their counterparts who went with the Democratic leadership, what we do know is that in the seven months since passage, the law remains unpopular and Democrats are running away from it rather than on it. In addition, there's the opportunity costs. Obama has been going around in interviews saying that the White House was too focused on getting policy right to focus on politics and communications. Well, had he not spent over a year on passing a health care bill, he could have had more opportunites to communicate.

But heck, I don't blame Cohn for thinking it was still worth it. If the Bush era Republicans had created Social Security personal accounts and real entitlement reform, I would have thought it was worth the price of the majority

View all comments (6) | Leave a comment

Edwin| 10.29.10 @ 10:32PM

Yikes, in these days of spell- and grammar-checkers how could anyone post an article with so many misspellings and other assaults on proper English?
Whatever his message, it gets lost amid the egregious errors.

Pucamama| 10.30.10 @ 12:00AM

Parallel is misspelled

Sea_Hunter| 10.30.10 @ 8:32AM

Anyone whom can find only a single way to spell a word lacks imagination. (G.B.Shaw)

The Underwearinator| 10.30.10 @ 12:11AM

Your a rasist!

Oldefarte| 10.31.10 @ 9:53AM

Simply put, Obamacare is nothing but WELFARE, as it's sole purpose is to provide governmental health insurance coverage to those too indigent [or to those having sufficient income but choosing not to buy it] to insure themselves. What's next with socialists-Democrats.....an all expense paid vaction to Europe for a month for the downtrodden, to be paid for by the income producing taxpayers???????????

PattyMor| 10.31.10 @ 11:48AM

Its another redistribution wealth on steriods; not to just the "poor", but to illegal aliens. If this thing is allowed to be implented, the aliens will be so ingrained into the U.S., we will no longer be able to get rid of them.

Leave a Comment

N.B. We encourage readers to share and discuss their thoughtful and relevant comments about this Spectator article. Comments are routinely monitored and will be deleted if profane, bigoted, or grossly impolite. Please be respectful. (And don't feed the trolls!) Thank you.

More Blog Posts by Philip Klein

http://spectator.org/blog/2010/10/29/obamacare-in-a-paralell-univer

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

Special Feature

Better that we become a nation of choosers rather than beggars. Our symposium on choice from the May, 2012 issue:

A Time for Choosing

James Piereson

The Road from Serfdom

Stephen Moore and Peter Ferrara

FLASHBACK TO: 1984

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Meet the Flukes!

F. H. Buckley | 5.25.12

The Wisconsin Turning Point

Peter Ferrara | 5.23.12

In Search of Muhammad

Aymenn Jawad Al-Tamimi | 5.25.12

Age and Kyl

Quin Hillyer | 5.25.12

Follow Me

Jay D. Homnick | 5.25.12

A Test of National Honor

Hal G.P. Colebatch | 5.25.12

How About the Record of DOE Capital?

William Tucker | 5.25.12

The Great Debate

R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr. | 5.24.12

ADVERTISEMENT