October 12, 2012 | 0 comments
October 5, 2012 | 6 comments
October 3, 2012 | 2 comments
March 1, 2012 | 4 comments
January 24, 2012 | 9 comments
Wow, when there are only about 310 Million people in America. I guess they’re looking to get a lot of help from 90 million foreigners? Hmmm.
USA Today Story (here):
Comedy Central has credentialed 300 journalists, commissioned 500 portable toilets, and received permits for 60,000 attendees on the National Mall, though the turnout could be much higher. “We’ve been talking about upward of 400 million or so,” says spokesman Steve Albani.
Again, wow. If they get 400 million people on the National Mall, I think Congressman Hank Johnson’s (D-Ga.) worry about landmasses tipping over might become a reality.
Either that 400-million thing is a joke or a misprint. Regardless, what will be more interesting is not the rally, itself, but its after-effects — figuratively and literally.
Figuratively, in that they’ve got their work cut out for them if they’re looking to turn back the Tea Party/Conservative tide set to hit shore on Tuesday.
Literally, if they’re looking to outdo the filthy and disgusting condition (photos here) they (those on the left) left the National Mall in last time they rallied.
And that was only a few thousand.
Imagine what 400 million people could do…
A man of faith in a godless age is hitting Americans where it hurts.
Mr. and Mrs. American Spectator Reader, let P.J. O’Rourke talk sense to your kids.
In Britain, defending your property can get you life.
The debacle of this president’s administration is both a cause and a symptom of the decline of American values. Unless Congress impeaches him, that decline will go on unchecked. An eminent jurist surveys the damage and assesses the chances for the recovery of our culture.
It won’t take long for conservatives to scratch this presidential wannabe off their 2008 scorecard.
The American Christmas, like the songs that celebrate it, makes room for everybody under the rainbow. Is that why so many people seem to be hostile to it?
Was the President done in by the economy, or by the politics of the economy?