Now that’s more like it. Daily Kos offers a
liberal defense of the Jack Conway ad.
Rand Paul is trying to sell the voters of Kentucky an image of
himself that doesn’t live up to his history. Liberals get the
vapors anytime a Democrat throws a punch, demanding that religion
be ceded exclusively to the GOP.
This race is closing, even Rasmussen sees serious tightening,
and in a tough year, we can pull out a victory in crimson red
Kentucky. Yet here we are wasting time and energy defending Jack
Conway from liberals getting the vapors over a campaign ad that is
factually true. There has probably been more liberal ink spilled on
this single ad, than in all the falsehoods in Karl Rove’s bullshit
ads.
I get that there is no important mission for journalists than
trying to get Democrats elected, but bear with me: The implication
of the ad is not true. There is absolutely zero evidence
that Rand Paul is hostile to Christianity and the politically
relevant fact is that he is mostly running on socially conservative
positions.
First, even if it is true that Paul was different in college the
fact is that was 30 years ago. Are there no middle-aged
men in America whose political and religious views are different,
and probably more conservative, than they were in college? Second,
Paul was attending a conservative Christian college. Lots of sons
of conservative fathers have had rebellious phases. George W. Bush
and Franklin Graham, anyone? (Though I can’t picture the
younger Graham doing bong hits with Aqua Buddha.) It has no
relevance to today, and there is no proof that Paul’s hijinks were
anything more serious than youthful irreverence even back then. And
he did not come from a nonreligious background: Ron Paul is a
churchgoing non-Randian whose leadership team includes veterans of
Pat Robertson’s 1988 presidential campaign.
But if Kos wants to go down this road, justifying this ad and
attacking the liberal reporter who actually broke the story the
commercial distorts, that’s fine. I just don’t want to hear any
whining about Rovian tactics and the Christian right the next time
a Republican runs an ad like this and subsequently wins an
election.
Nunya Biznezz| 10.20.10 @ 11:28AM
"But if Kos wants to go down this road..."
Of course they do. They can't stand the idea of someone getting into congress/senate that will oppose all their socialist bills.
Bill C| 10.20.10 @ 11:30AM
Actually there's a false equivalence between Rove and Jack Conway. Rove, to my knowledge, never questioned anyone's Christian beliefs. Rove 1) Isn't a candidate for office 2) dumping 300k in a paid campaign ad directly questioning one's faith in Christ.
As far as I'm concerned if the next Republican nominee for President puts out a nationwide ad that directly questions Obama's faith and insinuates that he's a Muslim because of his behavior in youth it's now completely fair game. Not only that they can stump on the issue and insinuate his "Muslim beliefs" are why he's doing what he's doing in the Middle East. It's horrible and wrong but that's the new political standard that the Democrats have set.
I don't think any even anyone (talk show host, cable host etc) of any prominence on the Right has done something like this let alone the nominee of a major party. Unless the DNC/DSCC/Obama condemn this ad stuff like this is fair game for 2012. The DSCC has actually defended it so that's not happening.
The only question that Republicans need to ask for 2012 is the only question that the left is asking about this despicable smear:
"Will it work?"