Film director and environmental poseur extraordinaire James
Cameron insists that we “have to live with less”. “Have to”
generally implies, and specifically in Cameron’s case is intended
to mean, something enforceable. Like, say, a law. Consistent with
these beliefs, or at least this pose-slash-talking point, he has
just given $1 million to the campaign working to defeat
California’s Proposition 23.
Prop 23 would delay implementation of the state’s ‘global
warming’ law called AB 32 — modeled after Europe’s disastrous
experiment, and so touted dishonestly as the ‘world’s first’ such
scheme. This is Cameron consistency because, as an energy rationing
measure, AB32 is designed to ensure that Californians have to
live with less.
That may cause some confusion among those of you in California
who have heard that AB 32 is actually the train out of the
current era of living with less, the train to a more prosperous
time when, to hear its cheerleaders tell things, we’ll all be rich
from selling windmills to each other. Or something.
But James Cameron clearly is also
self-loathing. And on this issue we find rare common
ground.
MarkJ| 10.20.10 @ 3:37PM
I also used to think James Cameron was "self-loathing." However, after much reflection, I have concluded that Cameron is merely an incorrigible a**hole.
I'm sure all four of Cameron's ex-wives will testify t0 the above fact.
Mad Hatter| 10.20.10 @ 3:45PM
Knowing what's goin' down is Titanic's James,
Greenness now cool (or hot) with Hollywood's dames.
Don't travel by car,
Send your Avatar,
To watch his denier shoot-out go down... in flames.
Mad Hatter| 10.20.10 @ 4:01PM
Cameron has a mil less for shopping,
"Let's all live with less!" Are those hooves klopping?
Pulling out all the stops,
To give the bill props -
It's a tether for 23's propping!
TheTrueCost| 10.20.10 @ 4:34PM
Environmental Hypocrites like James Cameron want to defeat Prop 23 but here is how he lives http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TKZ4RolQxec
Earl Richards| 10.20.10 @ 7:36PM
The California Jobs Initiative (CJI) is an oil corporation farce and fraud. There is no connection, whatsoever, between greenhouse gas emission reduction and the loss of jobs. This notion is an insult to the intelligence of the people of California. In fact, there is job growth in the clean, renewable energy industry. Chevron employs 65,000 worldwide and CJI is not going to change this. The only jobs created by the oil industry are clean-up jobs after oil spills and deep water, blow-outs and pump-handler jobs. CJI will make fantastic profits for the oil industry, increase air pollution, especially in communities around their refineries and there will not be lower gas prices. Koch Industries, Tesoro and Valero are super Enrons. Since when did the oil companies start to show any concern for the unemployed and their families and for small businesses? Occidental, Shell, BP, Exxon Mobil and Chevron are silent partners in CJI.
Richard| 10.20.10 @ 9:35PM
I'm still looking for the facts you put forth to support your argument. Surely your desk is piled to overflowing with proof statements, or your computer hard drive is choking with irrefutable evidence. Hmmm, must be here somewhere.
daniela | 10.21.10 @ 4:22AM
Prop 23 would delay implementation of the state's 'global warming' law called AB 32 -- modeled after Europe's disastrous experiment, and so touted dishonestly as the 'world's first' such scheme. I felt very shocked by this news.