Michael Cooper
reports in the
New York Times that most Americans are unaware that the
stimulus bill included tax cuts for the majority of
workers:
HUNTERSVILLE, N.C. - What if a president cut Americans’ income
taxes by $116 billion and nobody noticed?
…
In a troubling sign for Democrats as they head into the midterm
elections, their signature tax cut of the past two years, which
decreased income taxes by up to $400 a year for individuals and
$800 for married couples, has gone largely unnoticed.
In a New York Times/CBS News Poll last month, fewer than one in
10 respondents knew that the Obama administration had lowered taxes
for most Americans. Half of those polled said they thought that
their taxes had stayed the same, a third thought that their taxes
had gone up, and about a tenth said they did not know. As Thom
Tillis, a Republican state representative, put it as the dinner
wound down here, “This was the tax cut that fell in the woods -
nobody heard it.”
The president’s most ardent supporters use this fact, that the
tax cuts have gone widely unacknowledged, as evidence of his
unappreciated
brilliance in policymaking, and the president himself has
mentioned this fact as an example of how his administration is
downright
perverse in doing the right thing for the economy.
The public’s ignorance of the stimulus tax cuts, however,
indicates a few realities that the Obama administration would
prefer not to have to address.
The first is that during Obama’s first two years taxes have in
fact gone up. The stimulus tax cuts are only one of many changes to
the tax code. Americans for Tax Reform reports
that the 111th Congress enacted $352 billion in net tax hikes.
Although most of those taxes are obscure and will not take effect
as immediately as the stimulus tax cuts have, there can’t be any
doubt that they have shaped the public’s understanding of the tax
outlook. After all, cigarette smokers and tanning salon patrons —
who will suffer large targeted tax increases — number in the
millions.
Also, the public’s indifference to the stimulus tax cuts
suggests that they are forward-looking in their economic
decision-making. Under Obama’s tenure, the $3 trillion-plus that
has
been added to the federal debt far outweigh the $116 billion in
tax cuts. Taxpayers probably understand that that debt will
translate to tax increases sooner or later. And when they see Obama
and the Democrats trying not to extend all the Bush tax cuts for
next year, they probably figure that the increases are coming
sooner rather than later. In general, many of the Obama
administration’s counter-cyclical economic policies have been
predicated on the assumption that to some extent people don’t think
rationally about their future prospects in the short term. The Tea
Parties decrying the not-yet-materialized massive tax hikes should
give them pause.
Callawyn| 10.19.10 @ 1:52PM
What tax rate(s) were lowered in the stimulus? None of them, not one tax rate was lowered.
The 'tax cuts' Dems refer to in the stimulus were entirely 'refundable tax credits', what used to be called 'demogrants'. In plain English, they are WELFARE payments that have been redefined as 'tax cuts'.
One of the reasons the Dems don't run on this issue is because every time they bring it up it gets instantly debunked by someone like me pointing out that most tax rates either went up or are going up, none are going down, and increasing spending on welfare is NOT a tax cut.