Given a previous, sadly typical effort below this post to spout
smears as a way of distracting from the substance of what Dr.
Gabriel Calzada has exposed about the ‘green jobs’ scam, note a
story in today’s E&E News . It reads in pertinent part
(the part I omit notes Germany is hiking its rates again to pay for
their solar panel scheme):
RENEWABLES: Spain, Germany juggle solar subsidy obligations
(10/18/2010)
Spain plans to sell €1 billion of bonds backed by revenue from
consumer electricity bills at the end of the month, sources say, in
a move toward selling an eventual €17.6 billion in
government-guaranteed debt. (The euro is currently worth
$1.40.)
The money raised will be used to pay back utilities including
Iberdrola SA and Enel SpA’s Endesa unit for using the utilities’
funds to subsidize power prices for consumers. Under Spanish law,
the government needs to pay companies back their tariff
deficits.
Iberdrola is owed €3.7 billion, and Enel’s Endesa is owed €7.7
billion. The government owes other utilities €3 billion. The total
debt from delayed electricity payments could reach €14.6 billion by
the end of the year, according to government reports.
The plan still needs to be approved by the country’s security
regulator. Spain hasn’t sold such bonds since the collapse of
Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. in 2008 triggered a global credit
crunch and made investors scarce (Duarte/Sills,
Bloomberg, Oct. 15).
This is what Calzada has argued since 2006. He has explained
since about 2008 that the market was not purchasing the “rate
deficit” of Spanish utilities — that is the difference between
what the consumer is charged for electricity, and what it costs to
produce. That cost is kicked down the road to subsequent
generations, a construct of the state to keep the consumer from
seeing the true cost of the scheme which of course can lead to
things like opposition to the scheme.
Calzada noted that this could provoke the collapse of the whole
system, writing in his study that it is one of the unseen costs of
the green energy program. The total deficit is now nearly €20
billion ($28 billion) and, as the article says, it is guaranteed by
the government through electricity price increases. Meaning the
government has guaranteed that its scheme would be paid off, by the
ratepayer.
I am reminded of William Graham Sumner’s “The
Forgotten Man”:
The type and formula of most schemes of philanthropy or
humanitarianism is this: A and B put their heads together to decide
what C shall be made to do for D. The radical vice of all these
schemes, from a sociological point of view, is that C is not
allowed a voice in the matter, and his position, character, and
interests, as well as the ultimate effects on society through C’s
interests, are entirely overlooked. I call C the Forgotten Man.
In Spain, C is the future generations to whom the debt for
this indulgence is kicked, and is as Sumner describes. Even if one
wishes to ignore them and insist that C is today’s ratepayer, C has
a voice in that C can vote, but that voice is muted by hiding from
C what’s really going on by the state only increasing the cost of
electricity a fraction of what is incurred, while using other
taxpayer funds to bombard C with the claim that this is good for
C.
Imagine what this €20 billion will mean in terms of higher
household prices in the coming years. The National Commission of
Energy (a State agency) said in 2009 that it would require an
increase of 31% in prices to pay that off. Today that 31% is
probably too low to allow the repayment of the deficit. So, it’s a
costly scam, and they’re trying to make that cost up in volume.
The whole scheme should remind anyone who studies it of the
subprime mortgage bubble and crisis, with the securitization of a
debt that was supposed to be AAA until it was obvious that its
actual value was nearly nothing. So one might also note the
spectacular stock decline of the leading renewable companies there:
GAMESA is now €4 and was at about €20 just two years ago.
Which brings us full circle to California, which of course has
created its own grand troubles with public debt. And they are going
Spain’s route, adding a ‘green economy’ program that creates a huge
debt for the type of indulgence that’s catnip for politicians who
will not be in office when the (bigger) bill comes due. They pat
themselves on the back for creating what is a looming disaster for
the middle class and the larger society.
But the Left is right. It’s far better to smear the speaker than
address the substance. When that’s all they have.
Mad Hatter| 10.18.10 @ 3:12PM
Spain's floated bonds' upstream drift,
Have potential to make voters real miffed.
With true costs unblocked,
Spain electrically shocked,
May finally lead to a "C"-shift!
Mad Hatter| 10.18.10 @ 3:18PM
Chris, frequent AmSpecBlog adorner,
Paints rude commenters into a corner!
"To you it don't matta,
What says Doc Calzada?!"
Serves you right for horning in on Horner!
Mad Hatter| 10.18.10 @ 3:24PM
The costs of Spain's energy, so clean,
Sits just around the corner, unseen
Now all those poor slobs,
Looking for the Green Jobs,
May be stuck with a job raising green!
Tony in Central PA| 10.18.10 @ 9:25PM
Gamesa is here in my town
They play Uncle Sam for a clown
As the subsidies end
Their towers will bend
And the blades will stick into the ground