The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

In an interview with the New York Times magazine, President Obama singled out Rep. Paul Ryan as a Republican who he "trusts enough to work with on economic issues." But when asked about the comments, Ryan said that in reality the two have such deep philisophical differences that he's doubtful they'd be able to find common ground.

"What I’m proposing is so antithetical to his ideology, that I’d just have a hard time believing he would embrace anything close to it," Ryan told TAS on Wednesday. "I’m proposing an individual-based society, reclaiming the founding principles of limited government; free enterprise society, where individuals are made more powerful and government is made more limited. He believes in the opposite of that."

When I spoke to Ryan, I read him the following comments from Obama:

“I think somebody like a Paul Ryan who has got a lot of attention is absolutely sincere about wanting to reduce the deficit. The problem is, is that the plan he’s put forward so far is about a trillion dollars short. The numbers don’t add up.

And even with those numbers being fudged, most of his Republican colleagues in the House have not been willing to sign on to what he’s suggesting, in part because he does significantly cut benefits in things like Medicare, which are politically difficult to do.

I give him credit for at least being willing to put out there some tough choices, although, as I said, even there, the numbers don’t quite match up the way they should.”

Ryan disputed this characterization of his "Roadmap" plan, noting that Obama relies on an analysis by the Tax Policy Center while he got his numbers from the Treasury Department. At the same time, Ryan said he has always been willing to adjust the tax reforms to meet revenue requirements, but the point of his plan was to focus on the spending side. (For more on Tax Policy Center's revenue analysis of the plan, check out my post from March.)

Beyond that, Ryan said he was "glad" Obama said what he did about his sincerity, but that he doesn't think Obama would suddenly abandon his worldview.

He also said that Obama "is prone to using these sort of Machiavellian tactics where the ends justify the means," noting the recent attacks on the Chamber of Commerce as an example. 

And while Obama said during his famed performance at the House Republican retreat in January that lawmakers needed to stop demagoging entitlements, Ryan said that in reality Obama has "helped contribute to making it politically toxic.”

Ryan also said that he hasn't talked to the administration in about six months, when he spoke with former White House Budget Director Peter Orszag.

View all comments (6) | Leave a comment

Emiliano Zapata| 10.14.10 @ 12:40PM

May the hand wither that reaches across the aisle to Hussein O!!

Richard H. Davis| 10.14.10 @ 1:45PM

I think that it would be best if no budget were passed and that only bills which repealed current laws were passed. No SS checks, no Medicare payments, no highway funds, no funding of any kind for any reason until Obama signs the bills repealing everything since the Bush tax cuts.

Mattled| 10.14.10 @ 1:52PM

It's should be noted that Tax Policy Center is a combination of Urban and Brookings Institute. CNN always tries passing off TPC as bi-partisan. Apparently bipartisan now just means anything that's in any combination.
Need to hammer on that Mr. Ryan.

victor| 10.14.10 @ 2:01PM

When Pres Obama says concerning Paul Ryan:

"trusts enough to work with on economic issues."

You know that it's a classic case of Alinsky:
Freeze the Target.

Don't be fooled. Obama has said in the past that Ryan is devoid of ideas and slapped him during that famous Health Care Summit.
Obama is not suddenly a friend of Paul Ryan's and Paul knows this and knows that Obama is trying to look good to his base by "reaching" out to his opponent.
Paul Ryan is no fool and let's not even consider him one.

JShizzle| 10.14.10 @ 4:10PM

I love how Obama actually says that "Ryan's numbers don't add up!" Hilarious! The real numbers that don't add up you clown are the "40%" that still think you're worth a crap as a President.

Shamus| 10.14.10 @ 4:15PM

Obama's statements are tactical rather than factual. As his previous actions make abundantly clear, Obama has no intention of working with anyone. Ryan's plans are heavy on details, and Obama thinks he can confuse the public enough that they will not favor Ryan's proposals.

Republicans need to stick to simple proposals that are easily explained to the public.

Leave a Comment

N.B. We encourage readers to share and discuss their thoughtful and relevant comments about this Spectator article. Comments are routinely monitored and will be deleted if profane, bigoted, or grossly impolite. Please be respectful. (And don't feed the trolls!) Thank you.

More Blog Posts by Philip Klein

http://spectator.org/blog/2010/10/14/paul-ryan-doubts-obama-would-w

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

Special Feature

Better that we become a nation of choosers rather than beggars. Our symposium on choice from the May, 2012 issue:

A Time for Choosing

James Piereson

The Road from Serfdom

Stephen Moore and Peter Ferrara

FLASHBACK TO: 1984

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Meet the Flukes!

F. H. Buckley | 5.25.12

The Wisconsin Turning Point

Peter Ferrara | 5.23.12

In Search of Muhammad

Aymenn Jawad Al-Tamimi | 5.25.12

Age and Kyl

Quin Hillyer | 5.25.12

Follow Me

Jay D. Homnick | 5.25.12

A Test of National Honor

Hal G.P. Colebatch | 5.25.12

How About the Record of DOE Capital?

William Tucker | 5.25.12

The Great Debate

R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr. | 5.24.12

ADVERTISEMENT