In an interview with the New York Times magazine,
President Obama
singled out Rep. Paul Ryan as a Republican who he "trusts
enough to work with on economic issues." But when asked about the
comments, Ryan said that in reality the two have such deep
philisophical differences that he's doubtful they'd be able to find
common ground.
"What I’m proposing is so antithetical to his ideology, that I’d
just have a hard time believing he would embrace anything close to
it," Ryan told TAS on Wednesday. "I’m proposing an
individual-based society, reclaiming the founding principles of
limited government; free enterprise society, where individuals are
made more powerful and government is made more limited. He believes
in the opposite of that."
When I spoke to Ryan, I read him the following comments from
Obama:
“I think somebody like a Paul Ryan who has got a lot of
attention is absolutely sincere about wanting to reduce the
deficit. The problem is, is that the plan he’s put forward so far
is about a trillion dollars short. The numbers don’t add up.
And even with those numbers being fudged, most of his Republican
colleagues in the House have not been willing to sign on to what
he’s suggesting, in part because he does significantly cut benefits
in things like Medicare, which are politically difficult to do.
I give him credit for at least being willing to put out there
some tough choices, although, as I said, even there, the numbers
don’t quite match up the way they should.”
Ryan disputed this characterization of his "Roadmap" plan,
noting that Obama relies on an analysis by the Tax Policy Center
while he got his numbers from the Treasury Department. At the same
time, Ryan said he has always been willing to adjust the tax
reforms to meet revenue requirements, but the point of his plan was
to focus on the spending side. (For more on Tax Policy Center's
revenue analysis of the plan, check out my
post from March.)
Beyond that, Ryan said he was "glad" Obama said what he did
about his sincerity, but that he doesn't think Obama would suddenly
abandon his worldview.
He also said that Obama "is prone to using these sort of
Machiavellian tactics where the ends justify the means," noting the
recent attacks on the Chamber of Commerce as an example.
And while Obama said during his famed performance at the House
Republican retreat in January that lawmakers needed to stop
demagoging entitlements, Ryan said that in reality Obama has
"helped contribute to making it politically toxic.”
Ryan also said that he hasn't talked to the administration in
about six months, when he spoke with former White House Budget
Director Peter Orszag.
May the hand wither that reaches across the aisle to Hussein
O!!
Richard H. Davis| 10.14.10 @ 1:45PM
I think that it would be best if no budget were passed and that
only bills which repealed current laws were passed. No SS checks,
no Medicare payments, no highway funds, no funding of any kind for
any reason until Obama signs the bills repealing everything since
the Bush tax cuts.
Mattled| 10.14.10 @ 1:52PM
It's should be noted that Tax Policy Center is a combination of
Urban and Brookings Institute. CNN always tries passing off TPC as
bi-partisan. Apparently bipartisan now just means anything that's
in any combination.
Need to hammer on that Mr. Ryan.
victor| 10.14.10 @ 2:01PM
When Pres Obama says concerning Paul Ryan:
"trusts enough to work with on economic issues."
You know that it's a classic case of Alinsky:
Freeze the Target.
Don't be fooled. Obama has said in the past that Ryan is devoid
of ideas and slapped him during that famous Health Care
Summit.
Obama is not suddenly a friend of Paul Ryan's and Paul knows this
and knows that Obama is trying to look good to his base by
"reaching" out to his opponent.
Paul Ryan is no fool and let's not even consider him one.
JShizzle| 10.14.10 @ 4:10PM
I love how Obama actually says that "Ryan's numbers don't add
up!" Hilarious! The real numbers that don't add up you clown are
the "40%" that still think you're worth a crap as a President.
Shamus| 10.14.10 @ 4:15PM
Obama's statements are tactical rather than factual. As his
previous actions make abundantly clear, Obama has no intention of
working with anyone. Ryan's plans are heavy on details, and Obama
thinks he can confuse the public enough that they will not favor
Ryan's proposals.
Republicans need to stick to simple proposals that are easily
explained to the public.
Emiliano Zapata| 10.14.10 @ 12:40PM
May the hand wither that reaches across the aisle to Hussein O!!
Richard H. Davis| 10.14.10 @ 1:45PM
I think that it would be best if no budget were passed and that only bills which repealed current laws were passed. No SS checks, no Medicare payments, no highway funds, no funding of any kind for any reason until Obama signs the bills repealing everything since the Bush tax cuts.
Mattled| 10.14.10 @ 1:52PM
It's should be noted that Tax Policy Center is a combination of Urban and Brookings Institute. CNN always tries passing off TPC as bi-partisan. Apparently bipartisan now just means anything that's in any combination.
Need to hammer on that Mr. Ryan.
victor| 10.14.10 @ 2:01PM
When Pres Obama says concerning Paul Ryan:
"trusts enough to work with on economic issues."
You know that it's a classic case of Alinsky:
Freeze the Target.
Don't be fooled. Obama has said in the past that Ryan is devoid of ideas and slapped him during that famous Health Care Summit.
Obama is not suddenly a friend of Paul Ryan's and Paul knows this and knows that Obama is trying to look good to his base by "reaching" out to his opponent.
Paul Ryan is no fool and let's not even consider him one.
JShizzle| 10.14.10 @ 4:10PM
I love how Obama actually says that "Ryan's numbers don't add up!" Hilarious! The real numbers that don't add up you clown are the "40%" that still think you're worth a crap as a President.
Shamus| 10.14.10 @ 4:15PM
Obama's statements are tactical rather than factual. As his previous actions make abundantly clear, Obama has no intention of working with anyone. Ryan's plans are heavy on details, and Obama thinks he can confuse the public enough that they will not favor Ryan's proposals.
Republicans need to stick to simple proposals that are easily explained to the public.