-
SEQUESTER: The Horror!
March 1, 2013 | 4 comments
-
SOTU Preview: Human Props, Budget Fights, and Wedge Issues
February 12, 2013 | 0 comments
-
Hello, I Must Be Going
August 14, 2012 | 18 comments
-
Weekend Political Wrap-Up, Paul Ryan Edition
August 12, 2012 | 16 comments
-
Esquire Blogger Sees Paul Ryan, Shreds His Safety Net
August 11, 2012 | 13 comments
The Spectacle Blog
Are we sure she didn’t cast a write-in vote for some third option?
Arlen Specter might have recommended something out of Scottish law.
Tim| 9.21.10 @ 4:03PM
Another scorched earth RINO.
Siegfried X| 9.21.10 @ 4:12PM
The good news is they decided to strip her of her committee chairmanship today.
Murk is still in Alaska, campaigning instead of voting on legislation like an ethical senator.
CalMark| 9.21.10 @ 4:28PM
Bullseye!
Great post--and absolutely hilarious, to boot!
Brian| 9.21.10 @ 4:59PM
I think her name is Gina Barlowsky. We have to "write it in" correctly, or at least close.
matthew s harrison| 9.22.10 @ 12:49AM
The voters who write her in must spell her name correctly-which won't happen.
This woman is a childish establishment puke. The Alaskan electorate spoke-she is pissing up niagra falls if she presses on. Only one thing happens when one endeavors to do that!
Susan Will| 10.15.10 @ 9:23PM
I think it is extremely unethical and selfish of Lisa Murkowski to run as a write in candidate when she lost the primary to Joe Miller. The depths this women is willing to go to in able to keep her seat is unconscionable. If every candidate that lost the primary decided to be a write in we would have a mess on our hands. It now is going to take extra people to do the counting, legal challenges of which I am sure she will make not to mention that she is trying to dilute the vote for Joe Miller.
sesr| 10.21.10 @ 2:50PM
I think she has every right to run as a write in. She is very courageous and a true patriot to stop the lying Miller.
John| 11.3.10 @ 10:41AM
How is it unethical to run for a public office? Just because a small set of the electorate (those who voted against her in the Republican primary) decided they didn't want her as their candidate, shouldn't mean that she can't take her message to the entire electorate.
What is unethical are the party-politics rules that prohibit a candidate in Murkowski's position from appearing on the ballot.