April 25, 2013 | 9 comments
March 14, 2013 | 0 comments
March 1, 2013 | 0 comments
January 22, 2013 | 1 comment
January 3, 2013 | 23 comments
This morning Nate Silver posted an analysis, based on data from the American Action Forum, suggesting that generic ballot polls may be underestimating Democrats’ strength. AAF asked people in 31 closely contested House districts if they would vote for the Republican or the Democrat, then asked the same respondents about the actual candidates they’d encounter on the ballot. In these races, named Democrats are outperforming the “generic Democrat” by an average of 4 points. Silver’s hypothesis is that Democrats’ attempts to localize close races (since the national environment is stacked against them) might be succeeding in these districts.
Henry Olsen of AEI combs through the same data and counters that much of the discrepancy can be accounted for by Republican challengers’ lower name identification. His hypothesis is that as the election approaches and the name-ID gaps close, the discrepancy Silver highlights is likely to fade.
In general, I’m skeptical of generic ballot polls, and when I make election night predictions I always focus on polls that name candidates. But given that, as Olsen notes (citing Silver!), the generic poll has generally overstated Democratic strength, Democrats are probably fooling themselves if they take much comfort in the data Silver cites.
A man of faith in a godless age is hitting Americans where it hurts.
Mr. and Mrs. American Spectator Reader, let P.J. O’Rourke talk sense to your kids.
In Britain, defending your property can get you life.
The debacle of this president’s administration is both a cause and a symptom of the decline of American values. Unless Congress impeaches him, that decline will go on unchecked. An eminent jurist surveys the damage and assesses the chances for the recovery of our culture.
It won’t take long for conservatives to scratch this presidential wannabe off their 2008 scorecard.
The American Christmas, like the songs that celebrate it, makes room for everybody under the rainbow. Is that why so many people seem to be hostile to it?
Was the President done in by the economy, or by the politics of the economy?