A major Democratic Party activist group has denounced “Teabaggers” as “racist” and “extremists” in a fundraising e-mail.
“Have you watched cable news lately? The Tea Baggers are everywhere!” begins the fundraising appeal sent Sunday morning by Arshad Hasan, executive director of Democracy for America (DFA). “The Tea Party is news because they’ve won a few upset primaries — but let’s be honest — that’s not the only reason they’re getting wall-to-wall coverage. Honestly, that weirdly racist tinge makes for good TV. Bizarre, wide-eyed accusations of the President and hilariously misspelled signs demanding an English-only country will drive up news ratings. … People should know about these extremists.”
Asking Democrats to help “take our country back,” Hasan wrote: “Contribute $10 today and beat the Tea Baggers in November. Come November 3, the only reason the Tea Party should be on TV is for losing a lot of elections.”
Founded in 2004 by former Vermont Gov. Howard Dean after his unsuccessful Democratic presidential primary campaign, DFA is chaired by Dean’s brother Jim and boasts more than 1 million members. DFA has been a major sponsor of liberal bloggers, funding scholarships for dozens of “online activists” to attend this year’s Netroots Nation conference.
The DFA political action committee has spent more than $5.6 million during the current election cycle.
A man of faith in a godless age is hitting Americans where it hurts.
Mr. and Mrs. American Spectator Reader, let P.J. O’Rourke talk sense to your kids.
In Britain, defending your property can get you life.
The debacle of this president’s administration is both a cause and a symptom of the decline of American values. Unless Congress impeaches him, that decline will go on unchecked. An eminent jurist surveys the damage and assesses the chances for the recovery of our culture.
It won’t take long for conservatives to scratch this presidential wannabe off their 2008 scorecard.
The American Christmas, like the songs that celebrate it, makes room for everybody under the rainbow. Is that why so many people seem to be hostile to it?
Was the President done in by the economy, or by the politics of the economy?