Remember the
amnesty memos? The leaked documents that showed officials in
the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) agency
discussing an Obama administration end-run around Congress to
implement an administrative amnesty for untold numbers of illegal
immigrants? It turns out that USCIS wasn’t alone.
TAS has obtained a draft of a Department of Homeland
Security (DHS) memo that sources say eventually made it all the way
up to Secretary Janet Napolitano talking about doing much the same
thing — except in much greater technical detail and with more
attention to the political ramifications. The idea is that the
first phase of a program to legalize illegal immigrants could be
implemented by DHS even in the absence of “comprehensive
immigration reform.” Or, as the memo puts it, by “using
administrative measures to sidestep the current state of
Congressional gridlock and inertia.”
The memo emphasizes registering, fingerprinting, and screening
the illegal immigrant population (“excluding individuals who pose a
security risk”) but the administrative processes envisioned involve
giving eligible illegal immigrants work permits and an interim
process to “legalize those who qualify and intend to stay here.”
The memo does acknowledge Congress would have to act to extend
permanent lawful residence.
“If going forward with a larger registration program is not
possible,” the document obtained by TAS says, “we could
propose a narrowly-tailored registration program for individuals
eligible for relief under the DREAM Act, AgJOBS, or other
specifically designed subcategories.” The DREAM Act and AgJOBS are
pieces of legislation — targeted amnesties — that Congress has
not voted to pass.
Most of this is consistent with the USCIS memos reported on
earlier, except there is a lot more concern over how Congress will
react: “The Secretary would face criticism that she is abdicating
her charge to enforce the immigration laws. Internal complaints of
this type from career DHS officers are likely and may also be used
in the press to bolster the criticism.”
Like with the USCIS memo, the administration is likely to argue
that this just reflects internal deliberations rather than any
official policy. And this document is a draft that could have been
modified as it moved up the chain of command. More to follow.