The number of uninsured rose to 50.7 million in 2009 from 46.3
million in 2008,
according to the Census Bureau, as people lost employer-based
health insurance in a weak economy. But as with every year, it’s
important to dig deeper into the numbers to understand what they
actually tell us.
To start with, the Census report itself cautions that “health
insurance coverage is underreported…for a variety of reasons.”
One reason is that the survey asks respondents whether they were
insured in the prior calendar year, but some may respond based on
their current insurance status, or say they were uninsured when in
actuality they were only without coverage for part of the year
while between jobs. The report says the data “more closely
approximates the number of people who were uninsured at a specific
point in time during the year than the number of people uninsured
for the entire year.”
In addition, the report shows that of the 50.7 million
uninsured, 9.9 million are not citizens.
Also, some qualify for existing government programs but have
simply not enrolled. And some could conceivably afford coverage,
but have chosen not to purchase it — 19.9 million of the uninsured
make over $50,000 a year, and 10.6 million make over $75,000. Plus,
20.1 million uninsured are between 18 and 34, and some in this age
group may have decided that they simply don’t need insurance
because they’re relatively healthy.
What we do get a sense of from these numbers, however, are
trends. And this year, the percentage of people covered by
employment-based health insurance dropped to 55.8 percent, from
58.5 percent in 2008, making last year the lowest level of
employment-based health care since 1987.
The most obvious explanation is that lower employment translated
into lower employer-based health care. Liberals, no doubt, would
use this as an argument in favor of ObamaCare. But in reality, it’s
an argument to move away from an employment-based insurance model
and toward a model where individuals purchase their own health
insurance and can take it with them from job to job, or maintain it
when they lose their jobs. Instead, ObamaCare preserves the link
between employment and coverage.
Patriot| 9.16.10 @ 12:41PM
See what Marxist socialism does for you, folks?
Ain't wealth-redistribution grand? Misery redistribution is more like it.
Ice Tbone | 9.16.10 @ 1:49PM
The real solution is not to have individuals purchase their own health insurance, but to have a single payer plan.
Jonah| 9.16.10 @ 7:09PM
Yes, by all means, let's have government take control of our private life and death matters and run health care because they do such a bang-up job running the DMV and the Post Office.
anne price| 9.16.10 @ 3:40PM
How can the census know whether or not I am or not insured... I don't recall answering that question and would refuse to anyhow..
tss| 9.17.10 @ 10:39AM
The recent decennial census doesn't ask this question. The numbers reported yesterday were from the Current Population Survey (CPS) which is a more detailed survey that isn't sent out to everyone.
Chase | 9.16.10 @ 7:28PM
I like Sharon Angles approach do away with the public schools kids are so brainwashed in High School and College it is Pathetic