The Daily Caller has published an
interview with Spectator senior editor Angelo
Codevilla, focused on his
essay on the Ruling Class.
In the interview, Codevilla gives a succinct definition of what
he considers the Ruling Class:
People define themselves as “the ruling class” by tying their
livelihoods and hopes to government, and above all by a certain
attitude toward the rest of the country. Neither money nor
even professional position defines a person as part of the ruing
class or not. Rather, membership is all about drawing one’s
livelihood from one’s connection with government power, from
believing that this is proper, and above all from sensing that
sharing a certain set of attitudes and tastes makes one superior to
ordinary Americans.
And later, he divulges his ideal 2012 presidential candidate: a
“hybrid of a Newt Gingrich who had learned the proper lessons from
the 1990s, and of a Sarah Palin who had matured.”
Codevilla’s essay, which ran in the July/August issue of the
Spectator, was one of our most popular articles in a long
time. In the September 2009 issue, he had a piece that explored
many of the same topics. For some reason it did not achieve
anywhere near the popularity of the later piece, but it’s
well worth reading (and, at 6,000 words, only half as
long).
UDPATE: And the powers that be remind me: the “Ruling Class”
essay has been expanded to book length, and you can order the
book here.
Bop Berrigan| 9.13.10 @ 3:51PM
I've read the book and Dr Codevilla points out the validity of George Wallace's statement that "There is not a dime's worth of difference between the Democrat and Republican Parties!"