So Brett Favre had an unimpressive season opener last night,
after another annoying will-he-or-won’t-he-retire offseason. Is it
time to put the old man out to pasture?
I’d say that reaction is premature. Last year, Favre got to ease
into the season. His first games were against the Cleveland Browns
and the Detroit Lions. Even then, Favre mostly just handed
the ball off to Adrian Peterson like he did last night. Favre
passed for just 110 yards against Cleveland and 155 yards against
Detroit. He didn’t really air it out until he passed for 301 yards
against the San Francisco 49ers in Week 3. And although we all
remember the heroic last-second touchdown pass to Greg Lewis, this
was a very narrow victory over a fairly weak team.
In fact, Favre didn’t face a team that ended up having a winning
record until he confronted his old demons with the Green Bay
Packers in Week 4 (this was also the first time he really had to
carry the offense, with Peterson rushing for only 55 yards). The
Minnesota Vikings’ 6-0 run to start last season came with beating
four bad teams, a lucky break with Baltimore Ravens
kicker Steve Hauschka missing an easy field goal attempt that
would have changed the outcome of the game, and a grudge match
against Green Bay.
Let’s see what Favre looks like after getting 10 days to
practice for Miami. That’s followed by the Detroit Lions and then a
bye week. The Vikings-Saints rematch was probably good for ratings,
but realistically it was never likely to yield a memorable Favre
game under these conditions. It certainly wouldn’t have last
year.
UPDATE: Because Matt Stover is synonymous in my mind with the
term “Ravens kicker,” this entry originally gave him the blame for
Baltimore’s errant field goal attempt. Of course, it wasn’t Stover
who missed the field goal at all but Steve Hauschka, the man the
Ravens signed when they decided Stover was too old. Last year,
Stover filled in admirably for Adam Vinateri of the Indianapolis
Colts while Hauschka was released sometime in November and
Baltimore’s kicking game declined.
Oldefarte| 9.10.10 @ 4:15PM
I hope that Wendy's question is more prophetic!!!
SJM| 9.10.10 @ 11:05PM
The Packers let Favre go because they had a younger player on the bench who could take his place. The Vikings don't. He may not be the best quarterback in the NFL any longer but he is far better than average. Most teams would have traded up if they took him on last year. The Vikings did and they know it.