One of the most prevalent criticisms of President Bush was that
he wouldn’t acknowledge that he made mistakes and thus stubbornly
refused to alter his decisions based on new information. This
charge was most prominently associated with his policy in Iraq.
During the campaign, Barack Obama attacked John McCain for having a
similar trait.
“We’ve seen this movie before,” Obama
said at a May 2008 campaign event. “A leader who pursues the
wrong course, who is unwilling to change course, who ignores the
evidence. Now, just like George Bush, John McCain is refusing to
admit that he’s made a mistake.”
Obama, we were told, was more self-reflective, substituting
Bush’s coyboy swagger for sober introspection, which would allow
him to admit error. However, with his political standing continuing
to erode, President Obama is demonstrating the same type of
intransigence that he once criticized in Bush.
Instead of acknowledging that the $862 billion economic stimulus
package was a dismal failure that did not produce the promised four
million jobs, his administration continues to tout it as a major
success. Now, he’s announcing plans for yet another round of
government spending, making the same arguments that he made when
selling the original plan.
In addition, the New York Times
reports that Obama is going to dig in on raising taxes on those
earning more that $250,000 a year, even though many of them are
small business owners filing as individuals. These marginal tax
increases during a severe economic downturn come on top of a raft
of new tax hikes as a result of the national health care law he
rammed through Congress in the face of overwhelming opposition from
the American public.
Obama captured the White House on the idea that he was different
than President Bush, not just in terms of policy substance, but
also in governing style. He may just lose the presidency by
replicating one of Bush’s most prominent flaws.
Walt Gilbert | 9.8.10 @ 10:05AM
Spot-on analysis, and a new phrase has been coined: "coyboy swagger". I've got to figure out a way to work it into conversation.
Booger| 9.8.10 @ 10:20AM
Which is why 2012 will be just as bad for the Dems as 2010. After the '94 mid-terms Clinton started listening to Dick Morris and implemented his (in)famous triangulation strategy. Obama is far more wedded to ideology than Clinton was, as well as being far less experienced. Whereas Clinton was willing to tack towards the center (welfare reform, etc.) to boost his popularity (his only real concern), Obama seems to be either unable or unwilling to do anything other than push further left. Since Obama has learned nothing from history, he will keep repeating it. The only question is how much damage he will do to the nation before his four years are up.
martin j smith| 9.8.10 @ 10:26AM
I think the ones who really made mistakes were voters: first by voting for BHO. Second: In retrospect the problem I had with Bush was this: He was so much under attack by the Lest that I felt sympathy for him. The real issue with Bush is indeed there was valid criticism of at least two major issues: his handling of the Iraq War ( not the getting into the War ) and his immigration policies. Then there were the 9/11 truths ( or liars or whatever ). The irony of this for me was Democrats could have just as well been involved in "arranging" a terror attack as anyomne. For all I know it was bi-partisan. And, I should add I had problems with Bush's response to 9/11. DHO was a joke with colors and now we have "Big Sis "woweee !!!!!!!
Then there is Bush's backpeddling on the war on Terror itself which Obama has perfected to a science. So yes I think there continuity to some degree between Bush and Obama-which rally leads me to wonder about our government.
Tish | 9.8.10 @ 3:50PM
The real difference is that Bush knew he made mistakes, while His Oneness doesn't believe himself capable of being wrong about anything.