The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

We know it is expensive and unreliable.

But a new study from the Heritage Foundation also shows that wind power could be more dangerous to worker safety than traditional energy sources. The tragic explosions in Massey's Upper Big Branch coal mine and the Deepwater Horizon drilling rig have very appropriately focused attention on workplace hazards. But it would be a mistake to presume that switching away from fossil fuels to renewable energy would reduce fatalities, David Kreutzer, a senior policy analyst in energy economics and climate change explains.

It is important to understand that the current low number of total deaths in the wind-power industry is largely a result of the very low amount of power generated by wind, Kreutzer points out in his study. To properly project the potential consequences of switching to wind from coal, it is necessary to calculate the mortality rate per megawatt-hour.

"On a million-megawatt-hour basis, the wind-energy industry has averaged 0.0220 deaths compared with 0.0147 for coal over the years 2003-2008," the study says.  "Even adding coal's share of fatalities in the power-generation industry, which brings the rate up to 0.0164, still leaves wind power with a 34 percent higher mortality rate.  For the record, the workplace fatality rate for wind also exceeds that for oil and gas on an equivalent-energy basis."

The 20 percent renewable energy standard included as part of the Waxman-Markey cap and trade bill would require swapping about 800 million megawatt-hours of coal generated with current with 800 million megawatt-hours of wind power, Kreutzer notes. The end result here gives good reason for pause.

"Using the recent mortality rates as a guide, we would expect there to be 4-5 more workplace fatalities per year than if there were no wind power at all," he wrote.  "Even this comparison ignores the fatalities we could expect from the additional power lines needed for so much remote wind power."

Kreutzer's study calls attention to an unexplored dimension of the energy debate. The Obama Administration's pursuit of so-called renewable energy could have unexpected and highly damaging consequences over time.

View all comments (6) | Leave a comment

Sean| 9.2.10 @ 11:20AM

4-5 more deaths a year out of 300 million plus people won't be noticeable. Let us let the free market decide on which source of energy to use. Get the government out of it.

DRed| 9.2.10 @ 11:48AM

Bad timing on this one.

Booger| 9.2.10 @ 11:50AM

Windmills HURT the environment...
http://www.nj.com/news/index.s.....j_may.html
The slaughter of raptors (birds of prey) and bats is enormous. Ironically, raptors are protected by draconian federal laws; why these laws are not employed against windmill farms is anybody's guess. The slaughter of raptors and bats will lead to one thing, however....a surge in vermin and mosquitoes.

From hot air right radio?| 9.2.10 @ 1:55PM

Oh well. Maybe there is a silver lining , as long as the studio is the only thing the bloviators tear up with their hot air.

Mad Hatter| 9.3.10 @ 1:14AM

Wind turbines, if given a larger role,
Can spell the end for some hardy soul,
No anthracite to burn,
Doing men a bad turn,
Leaving behind widows, dresses black as coal.

Fred | 9.5.10 @ 11:15PM

The American wind industry is currently employing about 85,000 people and wind provides around 2% of our electricity. Coal provides about about 50% of our electricity but there are only about 105,000 coal miners. So that must mean that wind creates more jobs per megawatt/hr than coal. So its unfair to compare deaths per megawatt/hr, it should be deaths per number of workers. And wind power is in an intense phase of construction but some day most of the employment will be mostly maintenance. And don't forget to include deaths from manmade greenhouse gases on the coal side. 30,000 dead in Europe from the heat wave of 2003 and untold dead from the heat wave, wild fires, and smoke that choked and heated Russia this year. I'm a nurse and I know what 100 degree heat and smoke will do in an area with little air conditioning. Russia suffered a lot this summer and we may never know how many died. But there are now many more people in Russia convinced of climate change.

Leave a Comment

N.B. We encourage readers to share and discuss their thoughtful and relevant comments about this Spectator article. Comments are routinely monitored and will be deleted if profane, bigoted, or grossly impolite. Please be respectful. (And don't feed the trolls!) Thank you.

More Blog Posts by Kevin Mooney

http://spectator.org/blog/2010/09/02/wind-power-could-result-in-hig

ADVERTISEMENT

The Spectacle Blog

Meghan McCain Doesn't Get It

Jeffrey Lord | 1:36PM

The Paul Factor

W. James Antle, III | 1:29PM

Bain v. Solyndra

W. James Antle, III | 12:11PM

Illusionist

Yogi Love | 10:06AM

At Least He Apologized

Ross Kaminsky | 8:34AM

Gallup: Veterans Prefer Romney

W. James Antle, III | 5.28.12

SPONSORED LINKS

Special Feature

Better that we become a nation of choosers rather than beggars. Our symposium on choice from the May, 2012 issue:

A Time for Choosing

James Piereson

The Road from Serfdom

Stephen Moore and Peter Ferrara

FLASHBACK TO: 1984

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Meet the Flukes!

F. H. Buckley | 5.25.12

Terror by Any Other Name

Robert Stacy McCain | 5.29.12

The Wisconsin Turning Point

Peter Ferrara | 5.23.12

In Search of Muhammad

Aymenn Jawad Al-Tamimi | 5.25.12

The White House Sieve

Jed Babbin | 5.29.12

Age and Kyl

Quin Hillyer | 5.25.12

Osceola Who?

Reid Collins | 5.29.12

ADVERTISEMENT