In the Colorado Democratic primary for the US Senate, the
media is picking up on the theme that Clinton-endorsed challenger
Andrew Romanoff was defeated by Obama-endorsed appointed Senator
Michael Bennet.
Not so fast.
In a series of stories that
began in this space in February we noted that Pennsylvania
Congressman Joe Sestak’s admission of a job offer from the White
House in return for his withdrawal from the Democratic Senate
primary in Pennsylvania, if true, was in fact an allegation of a
federal crime. Research discovered that lo and behold this same
sort of offer had turned up in the Colorado Senate primary, with
a report that Mr. Romanoff had been offered a job in return for
his withdrawal.
The story gained traction. Congressman Darrell Issa, the
ranking Republican on the House Oversight Committee, began asking
questions. White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs began dodging
press questions.
Result? For months Mr. Romanoff was in the news —
particularly in the New Media or, as it is called here, the
Virtual Newsroom. Denver radio’s Peter Boyles at KHOW picked up
the story and I appeared with increasing frequency on the Boyles
show to discuss the latest events. Boyles would not let go of the
story even as the liberal Denver Post refused to pursue
it. Sean Hannity followed every twist and turn in Jobsgate both
on his radio and television shows, making Romanoff a household
name all over America. Not mention Colorado. This resulted in
months of bad press for Romanoff, culminating in a White House
admission that yes, indeed, they had offered Romanoff not one job
but his choice of three if he would withdraw. White House Deputy
Chief of staff Jim Messina was fingered as the culprit, the name
originally fingered in the lone Denver Post story on the
subject in September of 2009.
Finally, Mr. Romanoff himself changed his strategy. He went
public. Now he was everywhere, including the ever-persistent Fox
News. To Boyles’ amazement he agreed to appear on Boyles’ morning
show. I was invited — although Romanoff did not know. He had
ignored my calls. Doubtless he was stunned to find me on the
other end of the conversation with Boyles. My first question:
Would he cooperate with an Issa investigation or, if Eric Holder
ever had the nerve to investigate this White House, the Justice
Department? Crisply, stunned to find me there, Romanoff on-air
pledged that he would. The conversation with Boyles proceeded.
When it was my turn, I went back to his rationale for staying
silent — which was identical to Sestak’s. The people of Colorado
want to talk about jobs, he kept saying, not this… yada yada. I
pointed out to him that trust in public officials was at the very
heart of all other issues. If voters felt he… or Sestak… were
being so blatantly untruthful on this, how could they trust him
on other issues like jobs.
Romanoff, clearly miffed, picked up on my reference to once
having worked for a Senator and hence having some familiarity
with the basics of being seen as honest when dealing with the
public and the press. He said that when elected he’d consider
offering me a job as his press secretary. When the commercial
break came, he hung up, refusing to participate further.
Oh well. There goes the job.
The overlooked fact, which will surely be in play for
Sestak himself, is that the Sestak-Romanoff Jobsgate affair gave
Mr. Romanoff a black eye. He was pounded relentlessly by Hannity
on national air and Boyles on local air. Yesterday, he
lost.
Aside from his decision to stay silent for months, he has
one other person to thank for his defeat beside Peter Boyles and
Sean Hannity: Joe Sestak.
It was Sestak who launched this entire episode by admitting
to a job offer — then refusing to say more.
It is Sestak who must now face Pat Toomey in the
Pennsylvania Senate election — not the old and beatable
party-switching Arlen Specter. But a young, scandal free and very
smart conservative.
The Sestak-Romanoff Jobsgate scandal has just snuffed out
the Senate ambitions of half of the headlining
scandal-team.
Stay tuned. It’s only August.