The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

No More Mr. Nice Environmentalist Guy

On the main site today I expound on the blamethrowing between the Obama Administration and eco-gogue groups over the expected failure of Congress to pass cap-and-trade this year.

On the main site today I expound on the blamethrowing between the Obama Administration and eco-gogue groups over the expected failure of Congress to pass cap-and-trade this year. In the piece I cite Eaarth inhabitant Bill McKibben, chief carbon counter of 350.org, who is one of the most amusing (unintentionally) environoiacs bloviating today (but still taken seriously by his fellow Greens). I quoted a couple of lines from a “no more Mister Nice Guy” piece he wrote last week, but a few more of his complaints and recommended strategies to win politically on the issue were worth a mention here, just for giggles:

  • “They [“moderate and corporate” environmental groups] bent over backwards like Soviet gymnasts.”
  • “So now we know what we didn’t before: making nice doesn’t work. It was worth a try, and I’m completely serious when I say I’m grateful they made the effort, but it didn’t even come close to working. So we better try something else.”
  • “It is the carbon — that’s why the seas are turning acid, a point Obama could have made with ease while standing on the shores of the Gulf of Mexico. ‘It’s bad that it’s black out there,’ he might have said, ‘but even if that oil had made it safely ashore and been burned in our cars, it would still be wrecking the oceans.’ Energy independence is nice, but you need a planet to be energy independent on.”
  • “If we’re going to slow global warming in the very short time available to us, then we don’t actually need an incredibly complicated legislative scheme that gives door prizes to every interested industry and turns the whole operation over to Goldman Sachs to run. We need a stiff price on carbon, set by the scientific understanding that we can’t still be burning black rocks a couple of decades hence. That undoubtedly means upending the future business plans of Exxon and BP, Peabody Coal and Duke Energy, not to speak of everyone else who’s made a fortune by treating the atmosphere as an open sewer for the byproducts of their main business.”
  • “We also need to make real federal investments in energy research and development, to help drive down the price of alternatives — the Breakthrough Institute points out, quite rightly, that we’re crazy to spend more of our tax dollars on research into new drone aircraft and Mars orbiters than we do on photovoltaics.”
  • “For 20 years environmentalists have operated on the notion that we’d get action if we simply had scientists explain to politicians and CEOs that our current ways were ending the Holocene, the current geological epoch. That turns out, quite conclusively, not to work. We need to be able to explain that their current ways will end something they actually care about, i.e. their careers. And since we’ll never have the cash to compete with Exxon, we better work in the currencies we can muster: bodies, spirit, passion.”
  • “We’re following up in October — on 10-10-10 — with a Global Work Party. All around the country and the world people will be putting up solar panels and digging community gardens and laying out bike paths. Not because we can stop climate change one bike path at a time, but because we need to make a sharp political point to our leaders: we’re getting to work, what about you?”
  • “Kids are leading the fight, all over the world — they have to live on this planet for another 70 years or so, and they have every right to be pissed off.”
  • It took a decade after the Montgomery bus boycott to get the Voting Rights Act. But if there hadn’t been a movement, then the Voting Rights Act would have passed in… never. We may need to get arrested. We definitely need art, and music, and disciplined, nonviolent, but very real anger.”

And then there are “those damned shriveled ears of corn…”

topics:
Barack Obama, Global Warming, Environmentalism, Cap and Trade, Climate Change

View all comments (11) |

Flee| 8.10.10 @ 2:38PM

He let out an awful lot of gas in that bloviation. I would ask him a simple question: what if you're wrong? I think there are a couple of well known contributors here and elsewhere that would concur that this gasbag is full of himself and his nowhere movement.

Eric Cartman| 8.11.10 @ 10:19AM

Who are you to question this terrified pipsqueak, Flee? This over grown Mama's boy is fearing for his whole PLANET! The place where he LIVES! And you sit there with your disbelief and make fun of this balding Chicken Little clucking utter nonsense. Who are you, Flee, to doubt this pustule-on-life's butt, Al Gore wanna-be? Don't you know he's a Sunday School teacher and writes for Mother Jones, the Lefty Ahole bible? This scumbag carbon- based unit has every right to take himself out in some gruesome fashion to save this fragile rock we live on. So you go ahead, Mr. McKibben! You spout your gibberish while lowering yourself into a plastic shredder. Some of us here are behind you 100%

ncatty| 8.10.10 @ 3:02PM

In addition to a "stiff price on carbon" let's enact a stiff price on moonbeams, daydreams and farts.

Allan| 8.10.10 @ 3:29PM

Since the climate is far more complex and has more potential variables than an NFL football game, ask McKibben to build a computer model that can beat the point spread.

FastJohnny| 8.10.10 @ 5:00PM

I don't think anyone has a problem with turning out the lights when they leave the room, not driving to the store for one can of soda, trying to use cruise control on the highway to get better milage, composting the vegetable cuttings, recycling paper, glass and plastics and using a 75 watt bulb instead of a 100 watt bulb. These enviro-jerkwads seem to think that everyone out there is just burning through every natural resource as fast as they can get their hands on it. The problem is that if the US is switched to alternative sources right this second, the economy will go flat as a board. Of course this doesn't bother those green proponents with fat wallets, who will be just fine financially with or without carbon taxes, the rest of us will just barely be able to survive. There will be no economy to do anything with for the rest of us. I don't know about the rest of you, but I can barely afford the vehicle I have right now and can just barely make the bills for heating, electric and gas. With this agenda, many of us who are just making it, will no longer be a contributing part of society and the economy. Where am I going to get the money to pay these new energy taxes, to buy these over priced crappy electro cars...which btw have to recharge with what? Electric. The eco-greenie-liberals already poo-pooed Nuclear energy, which is about the best alternative. Screw them and their ivory towers. I would bet that if anyone of them (Al Gore-disgusting man that he is) were part of the everyday workforce that had to exist in the real world, they would be singing a completely different tune.

Allan | 10.19.10 @ 10:12AM

You built some beneficial details there. I did a look for within the matter and observed most folks will consent with your webpage.

Uggs | 10.22.10 @ 8:45AM

I would ask him a simple question: what if you're wrong?

Related Blog Posts

More Blog Posts by Paul Chesser

http://spectator.org/blog/2010/08/10/no-more-mr-nice-environmentali

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

FLASHBACK TO: 1995

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

My Generation’s Disease

Benjamin Brophy | 5.17.13

The Liberal Union Behind the IRS

Jeffrey Lord | 5.16.13

Not Ready for Primetime Players

Daniel J. Flynn | 5.17.13

Assessing a Week of Scandal

Matt Purple | 5.17.13

Oops, Maybe Government is Tyrannical

Marta H. Mossburg | 5.17.13

The View From the Other Side

George H. Wittman | 5.17.13

From Bimbos to Benghazi

Jeffrey Lord | 5.9.13

USPS: Radical Surgery Needed

Peter Hannaford | 5.17.13

ADVERTISEMENT