On the main site today I
expound on the blamethrowing between the Obama
Administration and eco-gogue groups over the expected failure of
Congress to pass cap-and-trade this year.
On the main site today I
expound on the blamethrowing between the Obama Administration
and eco-gogue groups over the expected failure of Congress to
pass cap-and-trade this year. In the piece I cite
Eaarth inhabitant Bill McKibben, chief
carbon counter of 350.org, who is one of the
most amusing (unintentionally) environoiacs bloviating today
(but still taken seriously
by his fellow Greens). I quoted a couple of lines from a
“no more Mister Nice Guy” piece he wrote last week, but a few
more of his complaints and recommended strategies to win
politically on the issue were worth a mention here, just for
giggles:
“They [“moderate and corporate” environmental groups] bent
over backwards like Soviet gymnasts.”
“So now we know what we didn’t before: making nice doesn’t
work. It was worth a try, and I’m completely serious when I say
I’m grateful they made the effort, but it didn’t even come close
to working. So we better try something else.”
“It is the carbon — that’s why the seas
are turning acid, a point Obama could have made with ease while
standing on the shores of the Gulf of Mexico. ‘It’s bad that it’s
black out there,’ he might have said, ‘but even if that oil had
made it safely ashore and been burned in our cars, it would still
be wrecking the oceans.’ Energy independence is nice, but you
need a planet to be energy independent on.”
“If we’re going to slow global warming in the very short time
available to us, then we don’t actually need an incredibly
complicated legislative scheme that gives door prizes to every
interested industry and turns the whole operation over
to Goldman Sachs to run. We need a stiff price on
carbon, set by the scientific understanding that we can’t still
be burning black rocks a couple of decades hence. That
undoubtedly means upending the future business plans of Exxon and
BP, Peabody Coal and Duke Energy, not to speak of everyone else
who’s made a fortune by treating the atmosphere as an open sewer
for the byproducts of their main business.”
“We also need to make real federal investments in energy
research and development, to help drive down the price of
alternatives — the Breakthrough Institute points out, quite
rightly, that we’re crazy to spend more of our tax dollars on
research into new drone aircraft and Mars orbiters than we do on
photovoltaics.”
“For 20 years environmentalists have operated on the notion
that we’d get action if we simply had scientists explain to
politicians and CEOs that our current ways were ending the
Holocene, the current geological epoch. That turns out, quite
conclusively, not to work. We need to be able to explain that
their current ways will end something they actually care about,
i.e. their careers. And since we’ll never have the cash to
compete with Exxon, we better work in the currencies we can
muster: bodies, spirit, passion.”
“We’re following up in October — on 10-10-10 — with
a Global Work Party. All around the country and the world
people will be putting up solar panels and digging community
gardens and laying out bike paths. Not because we can stop
climate change one bike path at a time, but because we need to
make a sharp political point to our leaders: we’re getting to
work, what about you?”
“Kids are leading the fight, all over the world — they
have to live on this planet for another 70 years or so, and they
have every right to be pissed off.”
“It took a decade after the Montgomery bus boycott to
get the Voting Rights Act. But if there hadn’t been a movement,
then the Voting Rights Act would have passed in… never. We may
need to get arrested. We definitely need art, and music, and
disciplined, nonviolent, but very real anger.”
He let out an awful lot of gas in that bloviation. I would ask
him a simple question: what if you're wrong? I think there are a
couple of well known contributors here and elsewhere that would
concur that this gasbag is full of himself and his nowhere
movement.
Who are you to question this terrified pipsqueak, Flee? This over
grown Mama's boy is fearing for his whole PLANET! The place where
he LIVES! And you sit there with your disbelief and make fun of
this balding Chicken Little clucking utter nonsense. Who are you,
Flee, to doubt this pustule-on-life's butt, Al Gore wanna-be?
Don't you know he's a Sunday School teacher and writes for Mother
Jones, the Lefty Ahole bible? This scumbag carbon- based unit has
every right to take himself out in some gruesome fashion to save
this fragile rock we live on. So you go ahead, Mr. McKibben! You
spout your gibberish while lowering yourself into a plastic
shredder. Some of us here are behind you 100%
Since the climate is far more complex and has more potential
variables than an NFL football game, ask McKibben to build a
computer model that can beat the point spread.
I don't think anyone has a problem with turning out the lights
when they leave the room, not driving to the store for one can of
soda, trying to use cruise control on the highway to get better
milage, composting the vegetable cuttings, recycling paper, glass
and plastics and using a 75 watt bulb instead of a 100 watt bulb.
These enviro-jerkwads seem to think that everyone out there is
just burning through every natural resource as fast as they can
get their hands on it. The problem is that if the US is switched
to alternative sources right this second, the economy will go
flat as a board. Of course this doesn't bother those green
proponents with fat wallets, who will be just fine financially
with or without carbon taxes, the rest of us will just barely be
able to survive. There will be no economy to do anything with for
the rest of us. I don't know about the rest of you, but I can
barely afford the vehicle I have right now and can just barely
make the bills for heating, electric and gas. With this agenda,
many of us who are just making it, will no longer be a
contributing part of society and the economy. Where am I going to
get the money to pay these new energy taxes, to buy these over
priced crappy electro cars...which btw have to recharge with
what? Electric. The eco-greenie-liberals already poo-pooed
Nuclear energy, which is about the best alternative. Screw them
and their ivory towers. I would bet that if anyone of them (Al
Gore-disgusting man that he is) were part of the everyday
workforce that had to exist in the real world, they would be
singing a completely different tune.
The debacle of this president’s administration is both a cause
and a symptom of the decline of American values. Unless Congress
impeaches him, that decline will go on unchecked. An eminent jurist
surveys the damage and assesses the chances for the recovery of our
culture.
The American Christmas, like the songs that celebrate it,
makes room for everybody under the rainbow. Is that why so
many people seem to be hostile to it?
Flee| 8.10.10 @ 2:38PM
He let out an awful lot of gas in that bloviation. I would ask him a simple question: what if you're wrong? I think there are a couple of well known contributors here and elsewhere that would concur that this gasbag is full of himself and his nowhere movement.
Eric Cartman| 8.11.10 @ 10:19AM
Who are you to question this terrified pipsqueak, Flee? This over grown Mama's boy is fearing for his whole PLANET! The place where he LIVES! And you sit there with your disbelief and make fun of this balding Chicken Little clucking utter nonsense. Who are you, Flee, to doubt this pustule-on-life's butt, Al Gore wanna-be? Don't you know he's a Sunday School teacher and writes for Mother Jones, the Lefty Ahole bible? This scumbag carbon- based unit has every right to take himself out in some gruesome fashion to save this fragile rock we live on. So you go ahead, Mr. McKibben! You spout your gibberish while lowering yourself into a plastic shredder. Some of us here are behind you 100%
ncatty| 8.10.10 @ 3:02PM
In addition to a "stiff price on carbon" let's enact a stiff price on moonbeams, daydreams and farts.
Allan| 8.10.10 @ 3:29PM
Since the climate is far more complex and has more potential variables than an NFL football game, ask McKibben to build a computer model that can beat the point spread.
FastJohnny| 8.10.10 @ 5:00PM
I don't think anyone has a problem with turning out the lights when they leave the room, not driving to the store for one can of soda, trying to use cruise control on the highway to get better milage, composting the vegetable cuttings, recycling paper, glass and plastics and using a 75 watt bulb instead of a 100 watt bulb. These enviro-jerkwads seem to think that everyone out there is just burning through every natural resource as fast as they can get their hands on it. The problem is that if the US is switched to alternative sources right this second, the economy will go flat as a board. Of course this doesn't bother those green proponents with fat wallets, who will be just fine financially with or without carbon taxes, the rest of us will just barely be able to survive. There will be no economy to do anything with for the rest of us. I don't know about the rest of you, but I can barely afford the vehicle I have right now and can just barely make the bills for heating, electric and gas. With this agenda, many of us who are just making it, will no longer be a contributing part of society and the economy. Where am I going to get the money to pay these new energy taxes, to buy these over priced crappy electro cars...which btw have to recharge with what? Electric. The eco-greenie-liberals already poo-pooed Nuclear energy, which is about the best alternative. Screw them and their ivory towers. I would bet that if anyone of them (Al Gore-disgusting man that he is) were part of the everyday workforce that had to exist in the real world, they would be singing a completely different tune.
Allan | 10.19.10 @ 10:12AM
You built some beneficial details there. I did a look for within the matter and observed most folks will consent with your webpage.
Uggs | 10.22.10 @ 8:45AM
I would ask him a simple question: what if you're wrong?