So it isn’t true that Spain’s green economy — Obama’s serially
cited model, until the catastrophe was exposed —
was nothing more than a bailout for investors in uneconomic
investments whose good money was, admittedly, incented by the
state into chasing uneconomic investments with the promise of
massive guaranteed returns (at the ratepayer’s, and futures
taxpayers’, expense, as I detail in
Power Grab).
Now it turns out that Spain’s scramble away from its “green jobs”
debacle has, under lobbying pressure from the Frankenstein
interests that this scheme creates, morphed into another
bank bailout to avert collapse from overinvestment in a
state-sponsored bubble.
Hmmm. Now where have I heard that bef… For anyone who has
followed the issue
this piece setting out why and how this is the case is a
worthwhile read, especially the parts between the lines.
Bob K.| 8.3.10 @ 10:54AM
The big problem is the matter of the storage of the energy.
Do you create the energy from matter where it is already stored such as in Uranium, coal, oil or gas and it's derivatives and from water backed up in dams or do you make it first from the sun, wind, tides etc and then find a place to store it or use it before it dissipates.
The energy realized from the former can be managed and controlled but there are large problems with costs in manufacturing it and environmental concerns and with it's waste by products.
The main problems with the latter are it's reliability and efficiency which are very important issues in our technological society, and everybody knows this and no one will invest in it without government subsidies to protect their investments. And it also has it's own environmental issues to address.