June 11, 2013 | 7 comments
March 1, 2013 | 4 comments
February 12, 2013 | 0 comments
August 14, 2012 | 18 comments
August 12, 2012 | 16 comments
Sheriff, er, Congressman Brad Ellsworth (D-IN) became one of the first Democrats to succumb to Republican pressure and give back contributions from scandal-tainted Harlem Democrat Charlie Rangel. The National Republican Senatorial Committee called on Ellsworth to give the money back on Thursday; Ellsworth announced he was donating it to charity late Friday.
Here was the NRSC’s volley: “Now that a bipartisan committee of his peers has determined that Rangel likely violated a range of key ethics rules, why does Ellsworth still stand by him and hold tight to his campaign cash?” spokesman Brian Walsh said in a statement. “Actions speak louder than words, and Brad Ellsworth’s decision to condone unethical behavior in Congress speaks volumes.”
Ellsworth got $12,000 in contributions from Rangel since 2005. He kept the money five months after Rangel stepped down as chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee. Ellsworth has now unloaded it, shifting attention to other Democratic Senate candidates like Kentucky Attorney General Jack Conway. Ellsworth is the Democratic nominee to replace Sen. Evan Bayh (D-IN). He is running against former Sen. Dan Coats (R-IN).
A man of faith in a godless age is hitting Americans where it hurts.
Mr. and Mrs. American Spectator Reader, let P.J. O’Rourke talk sense to your kids.
In Britain, defending your property can get you life.
The debacle of this president’s administration is both a cause and a symptom of the decline of American values. Unless Congress impeaches him, that decline will go on unchecked. An eminent jurist surveys the damage and assesses the chances for the recovery of our culture.
It won’t take long for conservatives to scratch this presidential wannabe off their 2008 scorecard.
The American Christmas, like the songs that celebrate it, makes room for everybody under the rainbow. Is that why so many people seem to be hostile to it?
Was the President done in by the economy, or by the politics of the economy?