The American Spectator : The Spectacle Blog : Lib Blogger: Michael Mann 'Reaps What He Sows'

Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

Lib Blogger: Michael Mann 'Reaps What He Sows'

By Paul Chesser on 7.23.10 @ 2:36PM

That journ-uh-list (and global warming believer) would be Gregg Easterbrook, blogging for Reuters, in a longer post that for the most part is an eulogy to the recently passed Stephen Schneider. As would be expected he remembers Schneider for qualities that were absent to skeptics, and he blathers about how the Climategate scientists had their correspondence "stolen," but he also hits a few points that will have some climate realists nodding in agreement.

That journ-uh-list (and global warming believer) would be Gregg Easterbrook, blogging for Reuters, in a longer post that for the most part is an eulogy to the recently passed Stephen Schneider. As might be expected he remembers Schneider for qualities that were largely undetected by skeptics, and he blathers about how the Climategate scientists had their correspondence "stolen," but he also hits a few points that will have some climate realists nodding in agreement:

The University of East Anglia, the place that was hacked, also looks bad, since its much-publicized “vindication” of the researchers involved was conducted by a committee paid for by the school. Of course the hired hands “vindicated” the organization that signed their paychecks!
...Important to rising disbelief in climate change is that the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the United Nations agency that produces global warming studies, allowed itself to be hijacked by Al Gore and a few other phonies. When the IPCC shared the Nobel Prize stage with Gore, it consented to being equated in the public mind with Gore’s relentless self-promotion. A decade ago, the IPCC was apolitical. Now it’s a marketing organization, selling the climate-doomsday brand. A new authority on climate change is needed to supplant the IPCC.
Also diluting belief in climate change is high-and-mighty behavior of some – surely not all — in the science community. Recently the environmental radio show Earthbeat ran a segment in which Susan Hassol, who’s in the instant-doomsday camp, claimed that scientists researching global warming are subject to “McCarthyism.” McCarthyism? Most climate scientists enjoy academic tenure, while being darlings of the P.C. cocktail-party circuit.
Last year the federal government awarded $7 billion in climate change research grants, making life cushy for climate scientists. I don’t recall Joe McCarthy giving billions of dollars to State Department China hands! One climate pessimist, Michael Mann of Penn State, has indeed received unfair treatment from the far right, but then again Mann is a holier-than-thou type who is quick to denounce those who disagree with him, and one reaps what one sows.

And of course you can apply his comments about East Anglia's "vindication" of its researchers to Penn State's "vindication" of Mann.

topics:
Global Warming, Environmentalism, Climate Change, Climategate, Michael Mann, Stephen Schneider

View all comments (2) | Leave a comment

Marc Jeric| 7.24.10 @ 11:04PM

This conspiracy by the far-left government-paid drones is now 40 years old. It started with
1) Globaloney cooling hoax in the 1970's; when that did not pan out it continued with
2) Globaloney warming scam in the 1990's; what with 12 years of cooling it transformed itself into
3) Climate change flimflam in the 2000's; and now we have to deal with
4) Cap & trade power grab.
In any case we have to nationalize everything and the introduce the United Nations-sponsored socialist world government.
Well, check "Chicago Carbon Exchange" on the Internet to see their board of directors.

Mark James| 8.4.10 @ 2:44PM

the most glaring part of this unscientific hooey is the fact that many top climatologists claim that the "green house gas mechanism" doesn't actually exist, which if proven true would means it was pseudo science based on pseudo science. DOESN'T GET ANY HIGHER ON THE BS SCALE THAN THAT.