I appreciate
John Tabin’s
thoughts about Journolist, but find his analysis
wholly unconvincing. I’m also bothered by what appears to be his
desire to give the Journolisters a pass: by putting
their efforts in the most innocuous light possible.
Of course, as John knows, the Journolisters are
not young undergraduate students prone to rhetorical
excess and self-indulgence. They are professional “journalists”
(read: left-wing political activists) who worked — and
continue to work! — at some of the nation’s most
prestigious and influential media outlets.
I’ll respond to John later today with a new blog post that
articulates our disagreement in greater detail.
Red Phillips | 7.22.10 @ 11:29AM
"I'm also bothered by what appears to be his desire to give the Journolisters a pass: by putting their efforts in the most innocuous light possible."
Yeah. What's up with that?
Of course it is always better to have the whole conversation for context, but these comments clearly show collusion to advance an agenda and contempt for conservatives.