I put this
WSJ article in today’s The Day Ahead, however it
deserves special attention as it reveals how a handful of banks
are grabbing market share previously unheard of in American
history, notwithstanding simplistic social studies textbooks
about Progressive era robber barons and fanciful talk about
greedy corporations precipitating the Great Depression. As it
reads:
“Bank of America, J.P. Morgan and Wells Fargo now
have 33% of all U.S. deposits, up from 21% in mid-2007-the
fastest shift of such a large chunk of deposits in U.S.
history. (emphasis added)…
The three huge banks made 57% of all home mortgages in the
first quarter, up from 28% in 2008.”
The recession clobbered (and still is clobbering) small and
community banks, many of which become consumed by the big boys.
Let’s not forget that the Federal government gave tens of
billions of dollars in stimulus to these large banks and they
dutifully used their government largesse to outlast, runout, or
buyout their competition. To be fair, big banks can
offer services like ATM and online checking that better suit
consumers than small banks. But this unprecedented rise, coupled
with the new finreg which promises to impose debilitating
compliance and transactions costs that fall disproportionately
hard on smaller operations, risks creating a financial landscape
where a few oligopolies run the whole show. That in turn
practically begs for an unholy alliance between banks and the
government, a relationship already emerging out of the new
financial regulation. Or take health care reform and insurance
companies as another example. It’s quite a cozy arrangement, big
companies allow the government to regulate their competitors out
of existence and in exchange give government the political
support, not least of which financial, to prop up the Washington
machine and the status quo. There is a lot of talk about how the
White House is “anti-business.” Obama’s agenda is not to destroy
enterprise in America, it’s to co-opt it into bed with
government. That way Democrats can direct the resources of
businesses in accordance with their socially just, eco-friendly
worldview without going through the messy process of riding
roughshod over the Constitution and nationalizing key industries.
Heck, it worked for Wilson and FDR.
Ken (Old Texican)| 7.20.10 @ 4:20PM
Max,
My mattress is getting very lumpy. (smile)
Seriously, as a mega-debtor, hyper-inflation might not be viewed as so bad by the feds.
Dixie Pixie| 7.20.10 @ 7:52PM
You did not expect a coalition of small local banks to combine their funds to produce the multi-billion dollar loans the Federal Government needs to survive.
Mega-Banks are needed to fund Mega-Government and both need the Mega-Corporations to create those funds. The individuals of the Public are just the fuel which drives the national system
The wishes of the Public are not necessary and are a distraction to the Mega-Organizations.
grant1863| 7.21.10 @ 8:27AM
How many on this board and at the Spectator bank with these folks? If you are so concerned then DON'T, find a smaller credit union or local bank for your business.
Max Brindle| 7.21.10 @ 4:57PM
My response to that would be these new rules and regulations will force small banks to consolidate or go out of business regardless of one's own personal preferences. For instance the mega banks have teams of literally hundreds to analyze the new legislation. Community banks can afford maybe 1 or 2 people to do the same job. They just can't compete in the world of "Big Finance" with these institutional barriers.