As
I mentioned last month, leftist
nonprofits and
environmental pressure groups have singled out the business
enterprises and philanthropy of David and Charles Koch as a
recent target for demonization. The Center for American Progress
holds them responsible for “a vicious attack campaign aimed
directly at obstructing and killing progressive reform” and
Greenpeace
says they “secretly fund the climate denial machine.”
Over the weekend the Washington Examiner’s Mark Tapscott
published an interview he conducted with Dr. Richard Fink,
who heads the Charles G. Koch Charitable Foundation and is an
executive vice president for Koch Industries, Inc., about the
family’s philosophical approach for supporting the principles of
limited government and free markets. He’s not shy about how
they’ve supported the tea party movement and educational
institutions that promote economic freedom. For example:
Q: What about the accusations that you are
driving these activities – that they’re corporate-sponsored
‘astro-turf’ rather than real grassroots movements?
A: That’s nonsense. It’s clear from the very
personal and passionate expressions of concern at these events
that they haven’t been scripted or orchestrated.
Tea parties reflect a spontaneous recognition by people that if
they do not act, the government will bankrupt their families
and their country. They’re absolutely right about that.
Now, if our work over the past 30 or 40 years has helped
stimulate some of those citizens who are becoming more active,
that’s great, but it’s a far cry from pulling strings.
What we have done is support the Americans for Prosperity
Foundation, which has been active in various forms for nearly
30 years.
David Koch has been a steadfast supporter of that foundation,
though Koch-related funding of AFP and the foundation has
amounted to a small percentage of their overall funding in
recent years. That’s a testament to their broad appeal. AFP and
its state chapters have begun collaborating with tea party
groups, and we’re in favor of any group willing to
constructively address irresponsible government policies.
The
whole interview is an intriguing read. Doesn’t seem like such
a big secret, does it?