The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

A new report by the National Taxpayer Advocate, who acts as an ombudsman within the Internal Revenue Service, has warned in a report to Congress that the agency is currently ill-equipped to handle the implementation of the new national health care law and that the legislation will place severe burdens on businesses.

“I have no doubt the IRS is capable of administering social programs, including health care,” advocate Nina Olson said in a press release.  “But Congress must provide sufficient funding and the IRS itself must recognize that the skills and training required to administer social benefit programs are very different from the skills and training that employees of an enforcement agency typically possess."

To deal with this issue, the report goes on to suggest that the "IRS mission statement be revised to explicitly acknowledge the agency’s dual role as part tax collector and part benefits administrator. "

Yet another example of how more government begets more government.

In addition:


The report expresses concern that a new reporting requirement contained in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act may impose significant compliance burdens on businesses, charities, and government agencies.  Beginning in 2012, all businesses, tax-exempt organizations, and federal, state and local government entities will be required to issue Forms 1099 to vendors from whom they purchase goods totaling $600 or more during a calendar year.  To meet this requirement, these businesses and entities will have to keep track of all purchases they make by vendor.  For example, if a self-employed individual makes numerous small purchases from an office supply store during a calendar year that total at least $600, the individual must issue a Form 1099 to the vendor and the IRS showing the exact amount of total purchases.  The provision will have broad reach.  According to a TAS analysis of 2009 IRS data, about 40 million businesses and other entities will be subject to the new requirement, including roughly 26 million non-farm sole proprietorships, four million S corporations, two million C corporations, three million partnerships, two million farming businesses, one million charities and other tax-exempt organizations, and more than 100,000 government entities.   All of these nearly 40 million businesses and other entities are subject to the new reporting requirement.

TAS has not yet reached any conclusions regarding the benefits and burdens of the requirement, but the report expresses concern that the burdens “may turn out to be disproportionate as compared with any resulting improvement in tax compliance.” 

Via the Washington Post.

View all comments (9) | Leave a comment

reasonable doubt| 7.8.10 @ 12:26PM

Expensive, Inefficient , Debilitating - Kings of Unintended Consequences.... "Big Government " is thy name.

Tina Ferrer| 7.8.10 @ 12:43PM

Please don't begin the writing of the procedure manuals just yet Ms. Olson. 11-3-10 will change things dramatically then on to 11-3-12 when we will all get back to our best at what we all do.

LiveFreeOrDie| 7.8.10 @ 1:07PM

We're from the Government, we're here to help you.

Brewer| 7.8.10 @ 1:29PM

So, last year as an indipendent contractor I bought a computer, paid for heating and cooling of my home office, had my car repaired, paid for mass transit, and paid a bunch of other vendors more than $600 as well.

This means that I need to cut 1099s to Staples, the local transit authority, my garage, the power company and the gas company, plus various other companies. I guess my CPA is going to have more work this year.

Maybe he'll do the 1099 for him free considering the "stimulus" the feds are forcing me to send to him.

Curtis Rasmussen| 7.8.10 @ 3:33PM

What are the fringe costs for filling out 1099's to comply?

40 million businesses * $50 (CPA or personal time used to fill out forms)=2 billion.

Bend over private enterprise. Non-productive work adds up to job and business loss on an epic scale.

glenny| 7.8.10 @ 5:28PM

I'm a CPA with a large firm; we issue LOTS of 1099s every year. Easy enough, each new vendor has to give you their name and fed ID # via a W-9, which you assume to be correct. End of the year, you report your payments to each vendor and the IRS via the 1099. PROBLEM: The IRS has a vendor name/ID # mismatch program that catches all mismatches and assesses a $50 penalty for each. Trust me, the number and amount of penalties IRS will now assess will be HUGE !!!!!!! glenny

H| 7.9.10 @ 2:48PM

You can send IRS comments regarding this new legislation. Go to http://www.irs.gov/newsroom/ar.....29,00.html
Let's send them our loud "NO". Maybe, just maybe they would hear us and make changes...

Leave a Comment

N.B. We encourage readers to share and discuss their thoughtful and relevant comments about this Spectator article. Comments are routinely monitored and will be deleted if profane, bigoted, or grossly impolite. Please be respectful. (And don't feed the trolls!) Thank you.

More Blog Posts by Philip Klein

http://spectator.org/blog/2010/07/08/irs-ombudsman-says-obamacare-c
ADVERTISEMENT

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Who Castrated Ann Coulter?

David Catron | 2.6.12

Justice Ginsburg Should Resign

William Tucker | 2.8.12

The Audacity of Obama's Secularism

George Neumayr | 2.7.12

Coulter Care

Peter Ferrara | 2.8.12

The Delousing of a Movement

R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr. | 2.9.12

Thank Him, Santorum!

Jay D. Homnick | 2.8.12

Let Mrs. Obama Eat Red Velvet Cake

Aaron Goldstein | 2.7.12

ADVERTISEMENT