The American Spectator

Bob Miller| 6.30.10 @ 3:18PM

While single out only one item of his behavior as pathological?

Oldefarte| 6.30.10 @ 4:00PM

ROBIN [CHICAGO] HOOD AND HIS BAND OF THIEVES' only desire is for Europe to increase their governmental spending upon American goods/services, so that he/they can tax the resultant increased profits from same [and thereby feed the federal piggybank]. They do not care if the US or Europe goes bankrupt in the process, since they have no financial skin in the game. They are not business oriented politicians, but are meerly Chicago COMMUNITY ORGANIZERS !!!!

martin j smith| 7.1.10 @ 7:56AM

There is something Obama does not know that the vast majority of US voters do know: He is a chronic pathological liar. Actions speak louder than words. And, The vast majority of voters " get it already" : " its all Bush's fault. Or, whoever. There is abolutely no surprise here at all.

The one thing that I would like to see is for more Republicans to call BHO out on this To the American voter the question should be posed: Can you vote for a President who always blames the "other guy" and never takes responsibility ?
Would you runa business with people who work for you take that position. Time to grow up or shut up.

Flabby Hoosier| 7.3.10 @ 7:52AM

Well put Martin. You've expressed much of my thinking perfectly. About this pathological lying: what just floors me is the fact that, once he arrives at the meat of a speech, you don't even need to be particularly well informed to spot the repeated, bald-faced lies as they start spewing forth, yet no one-- no one!-- ever calls him on it, ever. As you say, it would be a breath of fresh air if the Republicans had a guy designated to call them out. But alas, they don't have the guts.

Tom Poole| 7.1.10 @ 8:54AM

Off post slightly but; would someone who has more study of the law than I please explain the word"misdemeanors" as used in the Constitution. I watch and listen to the POTUS, and so far I can come up with "malfeasance", "misfeasance" and "non-feasance" in his words and actions, yet no one considers them suitable for impeachment. Given a singe one might not be, but Obama is guilty of serial disregard and multiple events. But of course I only had 1 year of International Law, so what do I know?

Cuffs| 7.1.10 @ 10:46AM

Obama should be tried & impeached
for criminal negligence regarding his handling
of the gulf oil spill.
Americans a letting him get away with murder
we just sit back and take it.
Americans need to wake up--how long are we going to tolerate this dangerous, criminal
fraud of a man?

Reneeca| 7.1.10 @ 8:55PM

Obama will continue to push the envelope because he has no one who will confront him in Congress or elsewhere. How many times does he need to mandate provisions that are unconstitutional without a whimper from anyone as to it's illegality according to our Constitution! With the Congress and Senate as well as the executive branch in his control, the pubic feels useless to stop him! For the life of me, I cannot understand why there isn't a statesman among the democrats that will stand up and say, 'this is not right!' I am waiting for another "Mr. Smith goes to Washington" moment, when someone with true ideals realizes that what is transpiring with Obama's agenda, is detrimental and dangerous to our country, a country that our kids will be living in austerity and dependant on the government for sustenance because of the debt put on them by this administration as well as a country we will not recognize as the same country in which we grew up.

lorillard| 7.11.10 @ 4:29PM

Right now there is a struggle between two groups within the Demo Party which is similar to the fall of the Romanov's. There is the usual culprits the activists and then there is the power politico's. First the politico use the activists to fell the monarchy, then the activists exterminate the politico and surprise the militarist exterminate the activists. Zero is for a complete change of America (destruction of individual wealth, destruction of merit recognition and complete governmental absolution of individual choice). He is relying upon fanactical activist attacks for votes. The activists are now turning on him for their/his agenda accomplishments. When they win he will not be radical enough for them and will have to be "replaced" because he follows their orders and does not know what to do on his own.