The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

19 seconds long, from Breitbart:

View all comments (2) |

Pete| 6.21.10 @ 4:50PM

You mean she is a progressive activist hack? Shocking. Who would have figured?

norris hall| 6.23.10 @ 6:31PM

Borks views on Kagan interested me...until he made the comment Kagan’s nomination was rooted in the president’s desire to make history with the nomination of an additional woman to serve on the high court. "For some reason, presidents get all excited for having 'firsts', and this would be the first court with three female judges on it," Bork said.

Come on Bork. That's a stretch. Maybe if she was the first woman...but the third woman doesn't even raise an eyebrow on anyone but you.

Bork should have said something like the Obama was excited to have the "shortest woman" in the courts history.

That would have been a REAL first.

More Blog Posts by Brian O'Connell

http://spectator.org/blog/2010/06/21/kagan-discussing-bork-hearings

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

FLASHBACK TO: 1995

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Foreign Policy as Farce

Jed Babbin | 6.17.13

The IRS Immigration Fraud Scandal

Jeffrey Lord | 6.18.13

The Biggest Fool of All

Doug Bandow | 6.17.13

Can Liturgical Music Be Saved?

Patrick O'Hannigan | 6.17.13

Revenge of the Fruitcakes

Peter Hitchens | 6.17.13

Obama's Climate of Intimidation

Matthew Sheffield | 6.18.13

The Mole in Don Draper

James Bowman | 6.17.13

Whither Suburbia?

Steven Greenhut | 6.18.13

ADVERTISEMENT