The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

The Washington Post reports:

As political gambles go, it's a big and risky one: $50 million to test the proposition that the Democratic Party's outreach to new voters that helped make Barack Obama president can work in an election where his name is not on the ballot.

Democrats's performance in November will largely defend on the economy, news events currently unknown, and the quality of Republican candidates and campaigns. But should they limit their losses in the midterms, it won't be because they were able to hang on to those new voters Obama attracted to the polls in 2008 and not only because he isn't on the ballot.

Obama is no longer the fresh-faced charismatic agent of change that he was two years ago, when many Americans were desperate to say goodbye to the Bush era. Now he represents a Washington status quo at a time when people are deeply disatisfied with the general direction of the country. If Democrats pin their hopes on getting those same voters to turn out for an off-year election, they'll be deeply disappointed.

View all comments (3) | Leave a comment

martin j smith| 6.21.10 @ 8:12AM

here are some issues: 1) Gulf oil spill and no help from Obama 2) the deficit lo0ok at Greece !!!!!!
and currupt unions 3) unsustainable Obamacare 4) the costs that are also unsustainable of illegals in this country.4) Endless higher taxes for all-0even the MIDDLE CLASS. 5) We are less safe since BHO took office big time.

Boiling it down; Its thye economy stupid and that means we are less secure as a nation. How can the Democrats defend their policies unless they are a bunch of comedians--which they are.

JmsA| 6.21.10 @ 9:04AM

If that's not a tacit admission of their failure in governing, and I use the term loosely--I don't what is.

Tish| 6.21.10 @ 6:13PM

High-tax states have been using the threat of public service cuts for decades, but I think Gov. Christie has shown how to do away with that old scare tactic.

Leave a Comment

N.B. We encourage readers to share and discuss their thoughtful and relevant comments about this Spectator article. Comments are routinely monitored and will be deleted if profane, bigoted, or grossly impolite. Please be respectful. (And don't feed the trolls!) Thank you.

More Blog Posts by Philip Klein

http://spectator.org/blog/2010/06/21/dems-to-spend-50-mln-to-chase
ADVERTISEMENT

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Who Castrated Ann Coulter?

David Catron | 2.6.12

The Delousing of a Movement

R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr. | 2.9.12

Justice Ginsburg Should Resign

William Tucker | 2.8.12

The Audacity of Obama's Secularism

George Neumayr | 2.7.12

Coulter Care

Peter Ferrara | 2.8.12

Thank Him, Santorum!

Jay D. Homnick | 2.8.12

Let Mrs. Obama Eat Red Velvet Cake

Aaron Goldstein | 2.7.12

ADVERTISEMENT