Everybody in journalism at one time or another misses a typo and
lets it into print. It just happens. I once was saved at the very
last minute from having published something about a health
department’s division of public affairs that left the ‘l’ out of
public. Now comes a
great column by my charming fellow New Orleanian Lurita Doan,
a
one-time victim of the lib hit gangs and establishment media
when she
headed the General Services Administration under George W.
Bush. Anyway, the column talks about how the Obama obsequiousness
to unions certainly didn’t help the performance of the Minerals
Management Service. But what caught my eye was this sentence:
“What the White House will not do is hold accountable
onionized federal employees that have performed poorly.”
Yes, you read that right. Onionized employees. I wonder if this
will lead to the White House being peppered with questions? Did
it make it hard for somebody to de-liver the bad news to Obama?
The column says some workers were on drugs, but were any of them
merely pickled with alcohol instead? And if the employees are
onionized, does that mean that the other employees not so
afflicted are running rings around them? And if you try to lay
them off, is it you who cries when you cut them? With all of
these possibilies running around in my head, I think my brain is
getting fried….
Jeff Perren | 5.31.10 @ 1:02PM
I think it means that the members of the current Administration are so beyond caricature that not even The Onion can parody them.
irish19| 5.31.10 @ 4:28PM
Jeff,
I immediately thought of The Onion as well. I think you nailed it better than I would have.