From the Corner at National
Review:
Make the case against liberal jurisprudence and vote
against Kagan while knowing it won’t stop her confirmation. In
my view, that’s what Republicans should do.
Ramesh Ponnuru has the right approach, generally, with one
caveat — it might actually stop her
confirmation.
We can’t give in and say that Kagan is a fait accompli or
that Obama’s a liberal, he’ll appoint a liberal justice, we
can’t stop it…
We should ask whether they’re suited for the court
and whether they’re suited for the process.
Harriet Miers, who, in my opinion, was not suited for the
Court or the process, could have been confirmed. She
wasn’t. Her nomination imploded from the inside out. I’m glad for
that. She’s probably a decent person and a bright legal mind. But
for the SCOTUS it takes more than that.
Besides, we got Samuel Alito as a result of
her withdrawal. Not a bad consolation by any measure.
The Miers scenario illustrates exactly what can happen to
subpar nominees. They’re not inanimate objects. While it might be
difficult to objectively prove them unequal to the task, we might
find that they realize the same themselves — and
withdraw.
“Advise and consent” could just as easily have been “an up
or down vote by the Senate” but it’s not; it’s advise and
consent. And the role of Justices, especially as viewed by the
left, is far too significant in 2010 to be anything resembling an
automatic bid.
Moreover, liberal pundits and politicians alike think the
Supreme Court is already too conservative. They think they’re
owed one more flip just to balance the court. They won’t
be willing to treat a Kennedy, Scalia, or a Thomas resignation,
for instance, as an automatic bid for another moderate to
Conservative nomination. So, it’s way too important not to throw
everything legal and decent at these nominees. If they can’t take
the process, they don’t belong.
And no, I’m not talking about the impertinence of questions
like “are you a racist?” as was asked of Alito, because we’re not
donkeys. We’ll leave that to the Democrats. But we should make
them have to defend their existence on the Bench.
And in the process, we just never know what might
happen.