Marxist theoretician Antonio Gramsci famously urged the Left to
overthrow bourgeois hegemony by infiltrating and
subverting the major institutions of society. The remarkable
success of so-called “cultural Marxism”
has, however, encountered an unexpected obstacle. Many
Americans have stopped passively cooperating, and
this annoys Mark Lilla to no end:
[W]e need to see [the Tea Party movement] as a manifestation of
deeper social and even psychological changes that the country
has undergone in the past half-century… . [I]t has given us
a new political type: the antipolitical Jacobin. The new
Jacobins have two classic American traits that have grown much
more pronounced in recent decades: blanket distrust of
institutions and an astonishing-and
unwarranted-confidence in the self… .
A million and a half students in the United States are
now being taught by their parents at home, nearly
double the number a decade ago, and representing about fifteen
students for every public school in the country… .
We are experiencing just one more aftershock from the
libertarian eruption that we all, whatever our
partisan leanings, have willed into being. For half a century
now Americans have been rebelling in the name of individual
freedom… .
They don’t want the rule of the people, though
that’s what they say. They want to be people without
rules …
Lilla’s remarkable tantrum
prompted me to remark:
What was the point of the Left’s “long march through the
institutions” if, having captured those institutions, they
can’t use them to tell everybody else what to do?
Pingback| 5.10.10 @ 11:02AM
Twitter Trackbacks for Gramsci Never Warned Them About This [spectator.org] on Topsy links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Ken (Old Texican)| 5.10.10 @ 11:29AM
Mr McCain, thanks.
Mr. Lilla does go on a bit doesn't he? Heh, now I know one of the sources of the talking points we see re-gurgitated here by the obfuscators each day.
Couldn't he have come to a clearer (and much more concise), conclusion?
My conclusion is that the "gubmint institutions " have simply lied to us too many times and on too big a scale. (ie medicare costs projections).
Not only that, but we can't even get an "oops, we made a mistake" from them.
Question:
You might have the answer at your fingertips...how many kids k-12 are in private schools across the country?
They are certainly getting a different slant on things than kids in many public schools.
Tim| 5.10.10 @ 11:57AM
An ongoing debate in my home: Can we afford to send our son to private school/ Can we afford not to?
Ken (Old Texican)| 5.10.10 @ 12:28PM
Tim,
I hear you loud and clear. My son hit school about the time the Oil industry collapsed here and I found myself over extended. I finally decided that he could do OK until 7th grade. (heh puberty).
I honestly believe our kids are going to be divided into two groups as they grow up. Sadly, I am afraid we are slipping into the British paradigm public/private (with names reversed of course).
As people move here...and begin talking about "good school districts", I tell them to forget that, but buy a smaller home in a nice area, or rent smaller in a nice area and use the extra money for private school.
Tim| 5.10.10 @ 3:57PM
Amen bro.
ECM | 5.10.10 @ 4:01PM
...an astonishing-and unwarranted-confidence in the self...
This comment, alone, says all you need to know about Mr. Lilla.