Former Sen. Dan Coats appeared earlier today at a unity press
conference with Indiana Republican Party Chairman Murray Clark
and the four men — John Hostettler, Marlin Stutzman, Richard
Beheney, and Don Bates — he beat in Tuesday’s primary for the
2010 GOP senatorial nomination. Coats won with just 39 percenet
of the vote while conservatives were split between Hostettler
and Stutzman.
But today the focus was on one thing: Beating likely Democratic
nominee Brad Ellsworth in the fall. Said Coats:
We kept the focus on the goal - and the goal was to replace an
enabling Democrat senator - enabling this liberal agenda that’s
taking place in Washington led by our president, led by Nancy
Pelosi and Harry Reid. The goal was to replace that with
someone that could go to Washington and represent the voice of
Hoosiers. Standing up against this federal takeover - this
liberal leftist agenda that I believe even a lot of Democrats
can’t support.
We’re going to reach out in the Fall to Republicans,
conservatives, Tea Party people, moderates, even Democrats that
may have some remorse about voting for this President,
particularly in light of what this agenda has been so far.
We are in deep trouble on a financial basis here in this county
and we all know that. And there are still threats from abroad
that have to be addressed and these are serious issues. The
focus is going to be on the issues, not on character, not on
personalities, not on who raises the most money.
Republicans hope to turn their competitive primary to their
advantage as they run against Ellsworth, who will be chosen by
the state party central committee because Sen. Evan Bayh (D-IN)
announced he wasn’t running for re-election too close to the
primary filing deadline for any Democrat to qualify. Ellsworth is
seen as vulnerable due to his health care and stimulus votes.
Darren| 5.6.10 @ 3:00PM
Doesn't matter. Ellsworth is going to send lobbyist Dan Coats back to North Carolina in november. GO BRAD!
RJ| 5.6.10 @ 3:21PM
I disagree - I give Coats a 75% chance to win. Ellsworth's health care votes and his record will probably defeat him. Ellsworth is on the wrong side of the fence this year.
Pingback| 5.6.10 @ 3:28PM
Twitter Trackbacks for Seeking Unity in Indiana [spectator.org] on Topsy.com links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Lunamaximus| 5.6.10 @ 3:35PM
Darren, you are delusional. Ellsworth is as empty of a suit as I have seen in Indiana politics, and that is saying something. I have great respect for John Gregg, but even he could only rationalize that there will be a race because maybe, just maybe, the republicans will split over the 5-person race. He said it with the upmost lack of conviction that only a southern Indiana pol can muster. So please, bet on, and contribute heavily to Ellsworth so your money isn't deployed where it could do some damage.
Heatpacker| 5.7.10 @ 11:21AM
Evan Bayh was able to win his Senate seat easily because he possessed three very valuable political advantages:
1. As governor of the state - huge name recognition.
2. A moderate image and a popularity that stemmed from that image.
3. A family brand-name.
Brad Ellsworth possesses none of these. And in an election year when the Democrats will be on the defensive, Ellsworth will spend more of his time explaining his past actions than explaining why he deserves to be Indiana's junior senator. He will be lucky to get 45% of the vote.
Pingback| 5.8.10 @ 8:56AM
NBA Highlights:Miami vs Indiana 4/2/10 | Indiana Pacers NBA Announcer links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Pingback| 5.8.10 @ 10:14PM
Wendts try to block outcome | Structured Settlement Svc. - Settlement Payout links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
hp0-j34 | 5.10.10 @ 5:30AM
thnaks