The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

Q. Why is Barack Obama like Superman?

It's an amazingly consistent process: Frank Rich conjures up his thesis, scouts around for confirming evidence, and finds it every time!

Not since Clark Kent changed in a phone booth has there been an instant image makeover to match Barack Obama’s in the aftermath of his health care victory. “He went from Jimmy Carter to F.D.R. in just a fortnight,” said one of the “Game Change” authors, Mark Halperin, on MSNBC. “Look at the steam in the man’s stride!” exclaimed Chris Matthews. “Is it just me, or does Barack Obama seem different since health care passed?” wrote Peter Beinart in The Daily Beast, which, like The Financial Times, ran an illustration portraying the gangly president as a newly bulked-up Superman.

Isn't that amazing? Three liberals -- Halperin, Matthews, Beinart -- share Rich's opinion that congressional passage of liberal health-care legislation without a single Republican vote makes Obama a magnificent winner.

Despite applause from Rich and his fellow liberals, however, the president's Real Clear Politics job-approval average is currently a net 1.9 (47.8% approve, 45.9% disapprove), dramatically down from a net 28.9 (60.7% approve, 31.8% disapprove) a year ago. Every recent poll shows opponents of ObamaCare outnumbering supporters -- 53% to 32% according to a CBS survey taken after the bill's passage --  and yet, in the world where Frank Rich seeks evidence of Obama's success and popularity, everything is coming up roses.

Having staked out this counter-factual premise, Rich then devotes himself to the unoriginal theme of Obama as a Rorshach inkblot test, asserting that people "see only the Obama they want to see" -- echoing my own observation in the immediate aftermath of the 2008 election:

Perhaps the most brilliant thing about Barack Obama's successful campaign was its vagueness. In offering himself as the all-purpose Change We Can Believe In, Obama gave believers a blank slate and a tacit license to project upon him their deepest longings.

The problem with that kind of belief is that the inevitable failure to fulfill such infinite longings results in disillusionment. (Has Obama started putting gas in Peggy Joseph's car yet?) And that disillusionment is most certain when it comes to the most startling of Rich's assumptions:

The speed with which Obama navigates out of the recession, as measured by new jobs and serious financial reform, remains by far the most determinative factor in how he, his party and, most of all, the country will fare in the fractious year of 2010.

Here Rich assumes that Obama will "navigate out of the recession" and that the only question is the speed with which he accomplishes the task. Yet unemployment remains at 9.7% and federal officials predict the rate will stay at similar levels through 2011.

Having expended some $800 billion on deficit "stimulus" spending, Obama finds himself facing the ugly economic reality of a market prepared to downgrade the AAA rating of U.S. bonds unless the federal government engages in serious belt-tightening.

Yet another wave of financial crisis, driven by trillions of dollars of bad commercial real estate loans, looms on the economic horizon. In 2009, there were 140 U.S. bank failures; there have already been 38 bank failures in the first three months of 2010, a pace likely to accelerate as the year continues. And the traditional liberal response to this kind of problem (i.e., more deficit spending) can only be undertaken at risk of sparking a bond-market crunch along the lines of the Greek debt crisis, except on a gargantuan scale.

Rather than navigating out of the recession, Obama and the Democrats have charted a course into much more serious economic trouble. As this unpleasant reality hits home in the months ahead, Frank Rich and his liberal friends will discover yet another way in which Obama is like Superman: His super-powers are strictly fictional.

View all comments (6) | Leave a comment

Oldefarte| 4.4.10 @ 2:17PM

As the old 'PAT [the pessimist] & MIKE [the optimist]' joke went, Pat filled Mike's Christmas stocking with horse manure; and upon discovering same on Christmas morning, Mike shouted with glee, 'I HAD A HORSE, BUT HE GOT AWAY'. What BULLEXCREMENT by this leftist lunatic. No doubt if he were on the deck of the sinking Titanic, he'd proclaim HAPPY DAYS ARE HERE AGAIN! The truly sad part is that Americans are actually brainwashed by such printed manure on a daily basis, and do not have the mental ability to tell fact from fiction!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

RickS| 4.4.10 @ 5:11PM

The problem with Frank Rich is that he is completely unqualified to comment on politics, economics, history, or public policy. Yet, strangely, that is what the NYT employs him to do. I'm not saying that everything Rich writes is completely uninformed useless drivel. He did come out in favor of "Cats," for example. But then even a broken clock is right twice a day.

Yosemeti Sam| 4.4.10 @ 11:16PM

" ... Isn't that amazing? Three liberals -- Halperin, Matthews, Beinart -- share Rich's opinion that congressional passage of liberal health-care legislation without a single Republican vote makes Obama a magnificent winner...."

Isn't that amazing - that Leftoids think alike?

Always pumping up a cartoon character.

SoCon| 4.4.10 @ 11:32PM

Elitist garbage; they're taking the part of the ruling class over the the common citizen. They are enemies of the people.

Can "re-education camps" be far behind?

Larry| 4.5.10 @ 12:52AM

Frank Rich was a third-rate theater critic, now he is a third-rate columnist, for the New York Times. This will be one of the reasons why the Times will eventually go bankrupt - they reward incompetence, just like their beloved Federal Government.

astorian| 4.5.10 @ 10:42AM

Frank Rich's biggest problem is... well ,actually, his biggest problem is that he's an idiot. But his second biggest problem is that he spent so many years as the New York Times' drama critic.

When you’re the Times’ drama critic, you have virtually absolute power over the Broadway scene. If you pan the latest musical, it will close overnight. If you give it a rave, it will run for years. It doesn’t MATTER if your reviews are well written, if your prose is clunky, if you clearly don’t understand the plot, or if your taste in music is atrocious. It doesn’t even matter whether your column makes a lick of sense. When you’re the Times’ drama critic, your word is law! A show is great or lousy because YOU PROCLAIM IT IS!

Poor Frank still hasn’t figured out that it doesn’t work that way for columnists in any other field. He thinks he can still proclaim that Obama is God, and that everyone reading will take his word as Gospel. He actually thinks he can turn a turkey like Obama into a long-running smash, and that he can close down the “tea baggers” as easily as he closed down the revival of “Seven Brides for Seven Brothers.” He doesn’t realize that his word no longer carries any special weight with readers.

Frank never learned to think clearly or to write persuasively because he never had to. and it's plainly too late for him to lear those skills now.

Leave a Comment

N.B. We encourage readers to share and discuss their thoughtful and relevant comments about this Spectator article. Comments are routinely monitored and will be deleted if profane, bigoted, or grossly impolite. Please be respectful. (And don't feed the trolls!) Thank you.

More Blog Posts by Robert Stacy McCain

http://spectator.org/blog/2010/04/04/a-because-frank-rich-tells-you

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

Special Feature

Better that we become a nation of choosers rather than beggars. Our symposium on choice from the May, 2012 issue:

A Time for Choosing

James Piereson

The Road from Serfdom

Stephen Moore and Peter Ferrara

FLASHBACK TO: 1984

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Meet the Flukes!

F. H. Buckley | 5.25.12

The Wisconsin Turning Point

Peter Ferrara | 5.23.12

In Search of Muhammad

Aymenn Jawad Al-Tamimi | 5.25.12

Age and Kyl

Quin Hillyer | 5.25.12

Follow Me

Jay D. Homnick | 5.25.12

A Test of National Honor

Hal G.P. Colebatch | 5.25.12

How About the Record of DOE Capital?

William Tucker | 5.25.12

The Great Debate

R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr. | 5.24.12

ADVERTISEMENT